• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

General Thoughts: Chemistry (1 Viewer)

Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
99
Location
Port Macquarie
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
Yeah, a lot of people struggle with chem calculations and the like so i think that might actually pull the cut off down a little/keep it the same as previous years.
There was exactly 9 marks worth of calculation questions in part B (so 9% overall), i saved them all for last then ran out of time to do them
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
70
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2015
What did people get for the citric acid question? Taking it being triprotic into account I divided moles by 3, worked out concentration and then since it was diluted to 10% for the titration I multiplied the concentration by 10, and I got 3.1 mol/L or something. It seemed a little high but cordial is really strong when it isn't diluted right? Please be right.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
4,741
Location
sarajevo
Gender
Female
HSC
2015
Uni Grad
2017
did anyone get the "why is it that a strong base and strong acid always produce -57Kj/mol when neutralised?"
i wasn't sure but i wrote shit like:

"all neutralisations are essentially the same reaction, a transfer of a H+ ion (transfer of a proton), this means that all neutralisations between strong bases and acids are essentially the same so should release the same amount of heat, this happens to be 57kJ/mol"
 

jamesfirst

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,005
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
It was pretty easy.


Did anyone else get 5 A 5 B 5 C 5 D in the multiple choice ???


all event spread out into 5s
 
E

Effekt

Guest
They fucked up the first question in industrial chemistry, a very stupid test. They seemed to only focus on titration calculations -.-'
 

jamesfirst

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,005
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
i think the crux of the question is "why do they all release the same heat (57)"

not really the fact that it's exothermic
Isn't it because it is exothermic because the syllabus says "Identify that neutralisation is exorthermic"
 

jamesfirst

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,005
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
They fucked up the first question in industrial chemistry, a very stupid test. They seemed to only focus on titration calculations -.-'
no they didn't.


It was sulphuric acid.
 

Nerdygirl

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
65
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2015
7 marker for Industrial was gift marks, all you had to do was know the environmental impacts for each and you were set, so happy it wasnt more specific.
 

Riku123123

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
38
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2011
did anyone get the "why is it that a strong base and strong acid always produce -57Kj/mol when neutralised?"
lol i just put something random for it . I said that it was exothermic and also that when neutralization occurs, water will always be produced so it would be similar and the energy would be similar =.=
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
99
Location
Port Macquarie
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
7 marker for Industrial was gift marks, all you had to do was know the environmental impacts for each and you were set, so happy it wasnt more specific.
iirf you had to link how the environmental impact then effected society, for example if you did Frasch process, So2 would form acid rain which would then damage buildings incurring financial loss, etc. I found it pretty good as well
 

4000

New Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2011
Messages
6
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2011
Chemcial Monitoring and Managemnet topic test IMO...
 

LostEuphoria

New Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
did anyone get the "why is it that a strong base and strong acid always produce -57Kj/mol when neutralised?"
Everyone seems to concentrate on the fact that neutralisation reactions are always exothermic. I wrote that it's because strong acids/bases will always dissociate completely (100%) and so the heat released is almost always constant, i.e. -57 kJ/mol. Now I'm worried, although my answer seems right to me -___-
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top