Annihilist
Member
Then mission double accomplished.What
they dont have plain packaging yet
Then mission double accomplished.What
they dont have plain packaging yet
I'm pretty sure this image already exists from the graphic images on cigarettes, before plain packaging.I have explained it before.
Basically, I don't want to carry around a packet looking like that, I don't want to be seen buying or holding a packet like that. It creates (or reinforces) a certain negative projection of smokers and a negative stigma. "You can smoke, but we'll make you look like a disgusting motherfucker if you do". Thats what they are saying. I don't want to be a "smoker" in such a society. And I think such a society is wrong.
Smoking is but one issue in this regard. Drugs are another - by making them illegal, we create a society where people who choose to take drugs are looked down upon by the rest of society. They are seen as disgusting, pathetic etc. by the majority of us. We should not be penalising or bullying people who make decisions the government doesn't like.
I have a personal and an ethical issue with it.
is it a negative projectionI have explained it before.
Basically, I don't want to carry around a packet looking like that, I don't want to be seen buying or holding a packet like that. It creates (or reinforces) a certain negative projection of smokers and a negative stigma. "You can smoke, but we'll make you look like a disgusting motherfucker if you do". Thats what they are saying. I don't want to be a "smoker" in such a society. And I think such a society is wrong.
Smoking is but one issue in this regard. Drugs are another - by making them illegal, we create a society where people who choose to take drugs are looked down upon by the rest of society. They are seen as disgusting, pathetic etc. by the majority of us. We should not be penalising or bullying people who make decisions the government doesn't like.
I have a personal and an ethical issue with it.
Does it need to be true?is it a negative projection
if it is true?
I'd go a step further and get rid of the images on cigarettes. The sort of people who smoke are not the sort of people who are going to be reminded of the dangers of smoking and stop. People who already make the conviction not to smoke are not convinced by the images on cigarette packs. They don't work. And the plain packaging doesn't work, really, but it's bullying people into not smoking by trying to make the packs as revolting and unattractive as possible. It worked on me because of my vanity, not because I'm scared of the dangers of smoking.I'm pretty sure this image already exists from the graphic images on cigarettes, before plain packaging.
Wait, but surely people will be more revolted by the graphic images than the plain packaging?Does it need to be true?
I don't think it is true.
I'd go a step further and get rid of the images on cigarettes. The sort of people who smoke are not the sort of people who are going to be reminded of the dangers of smoking and stop. People who already make the conviction not to smoke are not convinced by the images on cigarette packs. They don't work. And the plain packaging doesn't work, really, but it's bullying people into not smoking by trying to make the packs as revolting and unattractive as possible. It worked on me because of my vanity, not because I'm scared of the dangers of smoking.
generally this is just about keeping poor and stupid people alivewhy is it important
to keep people alive
This.why is it important
to keep people alive
The whole point is to make the warning labels more prominent. If you look at the proposed packaging designs, all it shows is a massive picture of cancer or rotten teeth or whatever. There's a tiny little brand label at the bottom. So it looks like you've bought a box of cancer, literally. That's all it shows on the packet.Wait, but surely people will be more revolted by the graphic images than the plain packaging?
And surely, if as you say, people are not convinced by the graphic images to stop smoking, they will not be convinced by merely making the packaging plain?
That is a good way of looking at itThe whole point is to make the warning labels more prominent. If you look at the proposed packaging designs, all it shows is a massive picture of cancer or rotten teeth or whatever. There's a tiny little brand label at the bottom. So it looks like you've bought a box of cancer, literally. That's all it shows on the packet.
why is it importantThis.
I guess so. It is important for all humans to have freedomplain packaging is up there with seatbelts and food labelling as some of the most serious human rights violations of our time
if i don't have the freedom to secretly lace my products with nicotine, it may as well be a command economyI guess so. It is important for all humans to have freedom