Lentern
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 4,980
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2008
I bet he listens to Chris Brown and everything.Adoption.
Late term abortions for no other reason than not wanting a child is pretty much murder.
I bet he listens to Chris Brown and everything.Adoption.
Late term abortions for no other reason than not wanting a child is pretty much murder.
and I stand by this....yes you didnt explicitly say they were communist, my apologies
you just said it was odd that they were anti-communist
No one argues that a zygote isn't alive, or that it isn't genetically human, people don't understand the basic meanings of terms, think about it.I think the issue here is that there is no definable period between when a foetus becomes human. As the post-birth abortion thread showed, there is a huge conflict (even in the academic scientific/philosophic) community of when 'life' begins.
Perhaps so, but the I just find the notion of aborting an almost fully formed human because somebody has decide they can't be bothered abhorrent. I actually personally don't agree with abortion at any stage of development, but I recognize a woman's right to do so in the early stages should they choose.I think the issue here is that there is no definable period between when a foetus becomes human. As the post-birth abortion thread showed, there is a huge conflict (even in the academic scientific/philosophic) community of when 'life' begins.
do you agree that killing a retard should be acceptable thenIs it really so bad to kill a baby? It's less bad that killing a dog.
No one argues that a zygote isn't alive, or that it isn't genetically human, people don't understand the basic meanings of terms, think about it.
What if the baby is a woman then lentern, you can't be on both their sides, what harm does it do to a woman to carry the baby to term at such a late stage?I bet he listens to Chris Brown and everything.
No its shouldn'tdo you agree that killing a retard should be acceptable then
yes. damaged genetic code shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.do you agree that killing a retard should be acceptable then
Sometimes complications arise during birth that require the pregnancy to be terminated otherwise both the baby and the mother will die.Different situation. But still, such complications would surely arise before 9months?
Still a situation.clutching at straws
1 in a blue moon situation.
That's how you said it.come on
you actually think I meant it like that?
Because we don't already have enough kids that need to be adopted.Adoption.
Late term abortions for no other reason than not wanting a child is pretty much murder.
They aren't even nearly "fully formed" until they've gone through puberty.Perhaps so, but the I just find the notion of aborting an almost fully formed human because somebody has decide they can't be bothered abhorrent. I actually personally don't agree with abortion at any stage of development, but I recognize a woman's right to do so in the early stages should they choose.
Imagine! What horror of horrors! Selfish super bitch, choosing to pursue a career rather than have children. She's going to hell. If the event of a conflict between a woman and a vague embryonic entity with potential for human life I will back the rights of the human life over the undefined entity every time.What if the baby is a woman then lentern, you can't be on both their sides, what harm does it do to a woman to carry the baby to term at such a late stage?
what she get fat? Maybe has to take some time off work (I would fully support financial assistance for that)?
How utterly selfish to deprive another of life for such petty reasons.
so many ways to go about itIf I had a heaps retarded child who I was going to have to provide care for the next 50 years, I would murder it.
Based on precedent, you'll only get a few years in gaol.
Exists for race, sex, transgenders, martial status, disability, careers, sexual preference, age, and HIV status. Given it's the sex party, that sound like it's probably designed to combat discrimination against prostitutes etc due to their profession.- "To enact national anti discrimination laws which make it illegal to unfairly discriminate against people or companies on the basis of job, occupation, profession or calling."
^ I thought this already existed?
The problem is not one of discrimination, it's just for whatever reason far less females choose to participate in party politics. If say 80% of your active membership is male then that is no doubt going to be reflected in preselections. It's definitely a problem of participation, which the proposed policy will do nothing to address."To bring about equal numbers of women in the Parliament through enabling the Federal Discrimination Act to have jurisdiction extending to political parties."
yes. damaged genetic code shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.
come at me cunts
^^^not being able to reproduce =/= killing them lol dummy
But someone willing to raise it won't magically appear.Wow thats cold, couldnt u just give the child to someone willing to raise it or hand it over to an orphanage?
did you read what graney said thoughWhat if the baby is a woman then lentern, you can't be on both their sides, what harm does it do to a woman to carry the baby to term at such a late stage?
what she get fat? Maybe has to take some time off work (I would fully support financial assistance for that)?
How utterly selfish to deprive another of life for such petty reasons.