I know similar topic has been discussed here about why selective school students need tutoring to compete or to survive. I seek opinions from those who have been doing high school recently with and without coaching to help my child. I know that coaching can save a lot of time for students who just could not get good information easily. As the syllabus for ever subject gets so big, there is not a lot of time to cover all the stuff unless the students are very diligent (workaholics). Therefore having a tutoring means studying ahead, doing more homework, having a second go at school when the topics eventually get covered, having a chance to ask questions, ... I feel that having tutoring helps to do better in exams but not necessarily better in project work where you do more research at a slower pace. Having more practice means that your exam answers will be more polished knowing that your exam work is like second attempt rather than first attempt.
My child is smart, pretty well rounded and and generally keeping pace with the best in her school (elite private) where the best (only a handful) are very very good (James Ruse quality I am talking about). She has no tutoring at all and a relax learning regime with lot of time to enjoy life, playing computer games, enjoying music, watching TV every day and movies every week. Now she starts to slip in a few areas that she was not naturally the best at. She is still holding ground in areas she is naturally good at. It is a problem because all her competitors go to tutoring and work like workaholics. They would be upset and cry if they get a mark under 85/100. How can a student without coaching and also wants a life beside studying match with extremely smart students who work so hard and having an extra day of study with tutors?
I hope some one who never went to coaching and still did extremely well could give me some ideas what would it take to cope with the very best who get constant coaching from year 7 - 12. I wonder if extra work at home by self-research and limited parental help in mentoring rather than direct detail help could help a student keep pace with these very hard working and continuously coached students?
I would also seek advice to overcome the issue that a student without tutoring may know the topics but fails to produce polished exam work to secure good marks. Teachers at school probably cannot help by giving kids a trial test before semester exams. Does this mean the only way is to have some form of limited tutoring before each exam?
I wonder that it is now impossible for smart kids to self-learn and match with those of equal intelligence and always have a tutor throughout the high school years?
Any advice to cope with high school English is much appreciated. My child is not naturally good at English except in reading comprehension and creative writing. She does not cope too well with analytical and critical response writing work. It seems that HS has so much response writing work and her tutored classmates are leaping ahead (not sure about this).
Any advice is much appreciated.
My child is smart, pretty well rounded and and generally keeping pace with the best in her school (elite private) where the best (only a handful) are very very good (James Ruse quality I am talking about). She has no tutoring at all and a relax learning regime with lot of time to enjoy life, playing computer games, enjoying music, watching TV every day and movies every week. Now she starts to slip in a few areas that she was not naturally the best at. She is still holding ground in areas she is naturally good at. It is a problem because all her competitors go to tutoring and work like workaholics. They would be upset and cry if they get a mark under 85/100. How can a student without coaching and also wants a life beside studying match with extremely smart students who work so hard and having an extra day of study with tutors?
I hope some one who never went to coaching and still did extremely well could give me some ideas what would it take to cope with the very best who get constant coaching from year 7 - 12. I wonder if extra work at home by self-research and limited parental help in mentoring rather than direct detail help could help a student keep pace with these very hard working and continuously coached students?
I would also seek advice to overcome the issue that a student without tutoring may know the topics but fails to produce polished exam work to secure good marks. Teachers at school probably cannot help by giving kids a trial test before semester exams. Does this mean the only way is to have some form of limited tutoring before each exam?
I wonder that it is now impossible for smart kids to self-learn and match with those of equal intelligence and always have a tutor throughout the high school years?
Any advice to cope with high school English is much appreciated. My child is not naturally good at English except in reading comprehension and creative writing. She does not cope too well with analytical and critical response writing work. It seems that HS has so much response writing work and her tutored classmates are leaping ahead (not sure about this).
Any advice is much appreciated.