uhmmmWhitman > keating > gillard > Rudd > the rest
I dont get the Keating fetish among leftists, he was an economic rationalist through and through. My post Mcmahon Prime Ministers rank as Whitlam, Fraser, Rudd, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Howard.uhmmm
Whitlam > keating> rudd> gillard
Not much love for old Johnny Howard eh?I dont get the Keating fetish among leftists, he was an economic rationalist through and through. My post Mcmahon Prime Ministers rank as Whitlam, Fraser, Rudd, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Howard.
Children attempting suicide behind razor wire and he and his ministers strutted around wearing the fact like some sort of badge of honour, he can never redeem himselfNot much love for old Johnny Howard eh?
One of the most shameful decades in our history IMHONot much love for old Johnny Howard eh?
I think the love for Keating is more about the man than the policies, you can't deny he was a character.I dont get the Keating fetish among leftists, he was an economic rationalist through and through. My post Mcmahon Prime Ministers rank as Whitlam, Fraser, Rudd, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Howard.
That may be true outside of the of the tent, but among Labor types he is enormously revered as some sort of "keeper of the leftie flame" more so than Gough, Hawke or Kevin combined it seems sometimes.I think the love for Keating is more about the man than the policies, you can't deny he was a character.
I'd hardly call Kevin a leftie, left-leaning on some issues at bestThat may be true outside of the of the tent, but among Labor types he is enormously revered as some sort of "keeper of the leftie flame" more so than Gough, Hawke or Kevin combined it seems sometimes.
I'd say he's the leftest Prime Minister since Whitlam, enormous investment in education, great commitment to reconciliation, abolished temporary protection visas, pro China, pro multiculturalism, removed forty pieces of LBGT discriminatory legislation, supports carbon pricing, supports super profits tax, spearheaded communications infrastructure through the national broadband network. That he presents himself as a nerdy, moderate, mild chap shouldn't distract from his largely socialist agenda.I'd hardly call Kevin a leftie, left-leaning on some issues at best
Most of your points are things that are true of any labor PM and really don't define him as any more "leftie" than the rest - they merely define him as a labor politician.I'd say he's the leftest Prime Minister since Whitlam, enormous investment in education, great commitment to reconciliation, abolished temporary protection visas, pro China, pro multiculturalism, removed forty pieces of LBGT discriminatory legislation, supports carbon pricing, supports super profits tax, spearheaded communications infrastructure through the national broadband network. That he presents himself as a nerdy, moderate, mild chap shouldn't distract from his largely socialist agenda.
I disagree with a lot of that, Rudd's shelving of the ETS has well and truly been revealed as largely the doing of Gillard, Swan and Arbib now, it seems very clear that he wanted that policy implemented whereas she did not. Keating as PM voted down a bill introduced by Hewson to have an ETS and I think it's very clear were it not for the Greens Gillard would never have implemented a carbon price so I would say carbon pricing is not the normal stand point for Labor PM's.Most of your points are things that are true of any labor PM and really don't define him as any more "leftie" than the rest - they merely define him as a labor politician.
He dropped carbon pricing as soon as it wasn't popular.
He didn't support same sex marriage (and anybody that doesn't can't claim to be a leftie).
And frankly a lot of what he did or didn't do was driven more by how they would play out politically rather than any genuine belief in them.
And if he truly believed in it he would have stuck to his guns. I also dispute your " well and truly" statement. Laurie Oaks is only one man with one source.I disagree with a lot of that, Rudd's shelving of the ETS has well and truly been revealed as largely the doing of Gillard, Swan and Arbib now, it seems very clear that he wanted that policy implemented whereas she did not.
That doesn't change the fact he could have easily implemented it in government but publicly spoke against it. I'm also convinced that any vote in favour is only to gain the support of his colleagues rather than any genuine belief in it.No Labor leader living or otherwise has ever supported gay marriage, and it is rumoured Rudd will vote for it in the conscience vote.
Lenore Taylor? You seem to also be ignoring the enormous efforts Rudd went to, infinitely greater than any other Australian politician, to bring together a global agreement at Copenhagen. You also seem to be basing your argument on this political fiction that Rudd could have magically rammed it through the senate and gotten his way.And if he truly believed in it he would have stuck to his guns. I also dispute your " well and truly" statement. Laurie Oaks is only one man with one source.
Um, no he could not have easily implemented it, the Labor Parties national platform was resolutely against it when he came to the leadership in 2006, changing it would have been very difficult indeed. And on basis of your cynicism about his voting motives I would argue you're predisposed to think cynically of him and there is little chance of a constructive dialogue.That doesn't change the fact he could have easily implemented it in government but publicly spoke against it. I'm also convinced that any vote in favour is only to gain the support of his colleagues rather than any genuine belief in it.
Don't give me that crap line of tories since kingdom come that "oh he just through money at the problem" go down to hospitals, schools etc and find a NUM or a principal that tells you that funding is an enormous part of the problem. And name one reform Gillard has seen through to completion since Rudd left office? The closest I see her coming is the carbon pricing which is still three years off completion.Rudd over promised and under delivered - apart from Fair Work (which any labor would do), immigration and NBN I can't think of any major reforms (not just throwing money at things). Gillard on the other hand has at least actually delivered on reforms.that he saw through to completion
Which means what exactly? No Labor leader since Evatt has been. Gillard doesn't either, she is not part of the socialist left faction she is part of a small subfaction called the Ferguson left which is way more closely aligned with the a bunch of renegades from the right faction than it is with the major lefties. They are very trade union/blue collar worker oriented, not socially progressive the Ferguson left.Rudd wasn't even part of the left faction
And now you have Gillard trying to out-Howard the coalition on asylum seeker policy. Oh how far the ALP have fallen.Children attempting suicide behind razor wire and he and his ministers strutted around wearing the fact like some sort of badge of honour, he can never redeem himself