• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

rumbleroar

Survivor of the HSC
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
2,271
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

R is the centroid of triangle OPQ. By symmetry, triangle PQS is a reflection of triangle OPQ. Consider R' is the centroid of triangle PQS. A property of all triangles is the centroid divides the median (i.e. OM, QN, MS, etc) into the ratio 2:1. Thus OR:RM is 2:1 and similarly SR':MR' is 2:1.

Thus since OM=MS, then it follows that SR:OR is 2:1, hence
Nice!!
However, I think one person tried doing that and got marked down, because the question specifically stated hence and that meant they needed to use the previous parts.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Nice!!
However, I think one person tried doing that and got marked down, because the question specifically stated hence and that meant they needed to use the previous parts.
It stated deduce not hence, not sure if the same still applies.
 

rumbleroar

Survivor of the HSC
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
2,271
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

It stated deduce not hence, not sure if the same still applies.
Oh crap, sorry, my bad. But one of the teachers went through it and told us it was marked down because it didn't relate to the previous parts, so idk if they would be marks back or not :/ but apparently the q was quite hard, as some teachers couldn't do it on the first go and stuff
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

View attachment 29383

This was from our term 1 complex numbers assessment

Much tear
It got ripped off Sydney Grammar though so some of you may have seen it before
No one got iii

Have fun :))))


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I could be derping atm, but I don't see how (3-2l)v = 2(k-l)z.

Because l and k are real numbers so if we re-arrange it, we have v=(3-2l)/(2(k-l))z, so v = A*z for some real number A, meaning that v and z are collinear, which is not the case as per the construction?
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I could be derping atm, but I don't see how (3-2l)v = 2(k-l)z.

Because l and k are real numbers so if we re-arrange it, we have v=(3-2l)/(2(k-l))z, so v = A*z for some real number A, meaning that v and z are collinear, which is not the case as per the construction?
Take the 2 equations from part (i), and re-arrange both so that is the subject, equate the equations, to yield an equation only in z,v which re-arranged gives you the required result, I did it and the algebra matches with the Show that
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Take the 2 equations from part (i), and re-arrange both so that is the subject, equate the equations, to yield an equation only in z,v which re-arranged gives you the required result, I did it and the algebra matches with the Show that
I understand how to get the result, but what I meant was that I do not understand how the result is supposed to work geometrically.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Take the 2 equations from part (i), and re-arrange both so that is the subject, equate the equations, to yield an equation only in z,v which re-arranged gives you the required result, I did it and the algebra matches with the Show that
I just did equation 1 minus equation 2, though I guess they are essentially the same thing.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I could be derping atm, but I don't see how (3-2l)v = 2(k-l)z.

Because l and k are real numbers so if we re-arrange it, we have v=(3-2l)/(2(k-l))z, so v = A*z for some real number A, meaning that v and z are collinear, which is not the case as per the construction?
Have you re-arranged it right?
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I think I've found the problem, when we consider the final result,

Substituting this into the first 2 equations, we get:



Meaning the division or multiplication by cannot be done, since its zero.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

The other problem is that from (iii), if:



and

then it implies

Also from part (ii) we get:

when we let

Thus and so

But we chose arbitrary positive real numbers for (k,l) and so that would imply which is definitely not true.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I think I've found the problem, when we consider the final result,

Substituting this into the first 2 equations, we get:



Meaning the division or multiplication by cannot be done, since its zero.
ok b10
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Yep I get it now, I was derping, it's part of the proof.

Since z cannot be v, the only alternative is that (3-2l) and (k-l) = 0, so k = l = 3/2, so using (i) that instantly yields (iii).
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

The other problem is that from (iii), if:



and

then it implies

Also from part (ii) we get:

when we let

Thus and so

But we chose arbitrary positive real numbers for (k,l) and so that would imply which is definitely not true.
We aren't choosing arbitrary positive reals.

The construction is enough to uniquely define one value each of K and L, and it just so happens that the values are the same (3/2).
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

We aren't choosing arbitrary positive reals.

The construction is enough to uniquely define one value each of K and L, and it just so happens that the values are the same (3/2).
Yep I mistook it as arbitrary values for k and l.
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Haha I just realised, k=3/2 was on the photo of the question.

Rumbleroar, surely you would have seen what to do from here? Or did you write that in afterwards?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)

Top