Recent content by roseviolett

my atar was 91.7 - none of the atar calculators were quite right, most were a bit higher (even uac's smh)

how did i get an 87, 88, and 89 - it's like they're really emphasising how i just missed 3 b6 maths and eng ext1 were better at least

i thought the exam was okay.. i was so slow for my essay (even though it was easy idk) so i rushed my 12 mark short ans -_- why i started with the 5marker i have no clue; i honestly think i lose some of my critical thinking ability in exams its not good

actually wanted to cry when I saw that it specified discursive idk if I even passed atp I'm second guessing my essays too

i feel like its highly unlikely she could have meant form in some other way? idk what to think tbh

oh what? is it referring to this thing in rubric: 'By responding imaginatively, interpretively and critically students explore and evaluate individual and common textual features, concepts and values. i'm pretty sure its referring to what internal assessments for module A can entail - like how...

personally for mod A i just write clunkier paragraphs since you have to talk about 2 texts concurrently - a lot of back and forth and for mod B (i do eliot so idk if this fits other texts that dont have multiple poems/sections) i use more structured paragraphs with one poem for each (unless they...

are people seriously believing this?? who are they insinuating the message is from anyway?? what vague "person from nesa" is going to actively dm someone with information anyway lmao

not sure. at my school someone asked for a less squeaky desk and they made sure she was sitting in the exact same place (but with a different desk yk) they organise the papers by student numbers so when they collect them its easier

it's just kind of ironic that nesa used what looks like it came straight out of dall-e when another text discussed the limitations of ai - question itself was fine tbh its a comparative so as long as you linked your analysis to the other text you'd be fine - they don't care about having complex...

generally the marking criteria is like this: - specifically answering the question - making 'insightful response' using well-chosen evidence - "coherent and sustained response using language appropriate for audience, purpose and context" if you have structure and made some points with evidence...

not going to question how on earth you managed to get the stimulus booklet when its been less than 2 hours since the exam finished that image really does look like it could be ai generated lol

fr my paper was so weirdly stapled the questions were connected by the same piece of folded paper? so I had to write at a weird angle so I didn't rip the pages

you get 10 mins of reading time to read through all the unseen texts primarily, so if you go do the essay first you'll probably have to basically read through them all again to answer the questions which takes away time + personally getting the short answer out of the way makes the essay less...

what do people even mean by stuff "getting leaked" - from where?? its not like nesa is just keeping the hsc papers in a google drive folder somewhere, and nesa markers know better than to just loudly discuss hsc questions in a library full of hsc students (or at least they should know better...)...