:*( It looked super interesting but I didn't even apply for it because I didn't think I'd make the ATAR (I was completely clueless). Turns out I was well above the cut-off. Sigh. Going to miss that peaceful atmosphere.
Now I'm going to devolve into one of those guys that trolls ANU forums by...
http://mahler.cse.unsw.edu.au/rectangles/
Rectangles OP. It only sorts through 1000 possibilities, so it's not necessarily optimal, but it's a fast and easy method of finding a timetable.
Yeah, if your marks are good enough.
TBH though I've heard a couple of current/former students say that the TSP is somewhat gimmicky, at least compared to USyd's TSP program, which actually has projects and courses and whatnot.
http://www.131500.com.au/tickets/fares/myzone
http://www.131500.com.au/tickets/fares/fares
Read these, they should help. Your best bet is probably to get concession weekly MyMultis (zone depends on your transport arrangements), and then maybe keep a TravelTen on you just in case you lose your...
1st year B. Science (Advanced), going to major in Maths (focusing on pure) and Physics (focusing on theoretical). I think that Maths/Phys double major was previously disallowed in Adv. Sc., but they've opened it up this year according to a few staff members.
... Then I'm going to USyd to study...
Hey, I was over at the advising day for science and talked to the associate dean, he said that for this year he would try to include an optional maths "module" in SCIF1131 similar to the SCIF1121 discipline-specific modules. If maths is your thing that might close the gap a bit.
Sad. And I thought I had a good chance with an ATAR estimate of ~99.
Although now that I mention it, I didn't actually bother to say anything about that on my application.
Great, thanks. I actually didn't get iii) or iv) in the test - the ideas were all there but I couldn't put them together coherently enough. Everything always seems to crystallise after the test is over, when your mind isn't racing.
Also, Pure Mathematics PhD @ ANU.
So. Jealous.
Anyone get 16)c)iii)?
For 16)c)iv):
P(k) is greatest when k is the largest integer that satisfies P(k)>P(k-1) i.e. the largest k for which k^2-k-n<0. If k^2-k-n<0, then the postulate for part (iii) is correct is true and thus, sqrt(n) > k - (1/2). Now we want the largest k for which k <...