i did the majority of my essay on the air war and then a little bit on the russian campaign
this seemed to be the general consensus in my class too, most people added a second in towards the end of the essay
see this is why i avoided this question, nationalism can exist in democracy. its not a system of government. i mean ho chi minh was a nationalist and hes on the other end of the spectrum
consolidation seemed much simpler and im shocked at the amount of people doing nationalism
"our people suffered heavily from our new gunfire methods - the barrage"
"hun used a lot of shrapnel against us - dirty stuff"
man barrage, shelling, and shrapnel are all essentially synonyms that question was so shit
I put barrage, now I feel like I might be wrong, but I can't even remember...
Depends on your line of argument, if you say they solved the issues you can look at the stability Stresemann brought leading to germany being considered an international figure again, Hindenburg being brought in as President etc.
If you take a negative line and say that the still had many...
2011 had "Evaluate the significance of D Day and the liberation of France in bringing about the end of the conflict in Europe by 1945"
So if Allied victory were to come up it'd be in the form of the importance of russian counter offensives or possibly final defeat in general and how it came...
What points could you argue for either of these events in a question such as "Evaluate the significance of D Day and the liberation of France in bringing about the end of the conflict in Europe by 1945" or an equivalent for the counter offensives
Obviously you'd make the point that it...
German advance was essentially assessed in 2012 with "Why Was Germany so successful in the European War up to the start of Operation Barbarossa?". It's kind of a combined question but it definitely addresses the fall of Poland, France, Low Countries etc. and whether this was the result of...
Positive.. They're worked answer though and they didn't take off the price of actually playing the game.
I took a look at the specimen exam or whatever it is put out by the BoS and the question they have on it factors in the price as well, so I'm just gonna continue doing it that way
In a game two unbiased coins are tossed. A player outlays $30 and if both coins show tails the player is paid $48, if both coins show heads the player is paid $60
What is the expected return from $300 for this game?
When finding the answer, should I take the $30 off the winnings? The...
I mean does it live up to the shitty comments or is it just the typical arts hate? Is the course actually worth the mid 90s atar. And what are job prospects like after? I'd like to major in something like international relations or maybe even history seeing as thats now possible at USYD i think
What's the go with this degree? Like most arts degrees I've seen a lot of hate about its "uselessness" and how its essentially BArts with a higher cutoff.