Search results

I finished my Labour law ex today....hopefully first HD,

iambored still here? HSC 2003? i guess that narrows it down...either you have left uni and graduated or....a LLB double degree student......

i'll be doing foundations of commercial law and also family law.....2 subjects gonna be very cruisy for u MJ....

Well, i just done my property 316 exam today, 24 hours, 12 pages 3 questions..... and no sleep! thats 5800 words from 10am yesterdat to this morning 6am........not to mention its a 100% final with instant fail, no late penalty submission beat that IWR!!

Printed, done.... drop it off tomorrow, goto the tute and finish..... Also I Wanna Rock, humanitarian intervention is already "valid" if the SC wants to intervene under CH VII and the "responsibility to protect" concept.... So i guess your focus is mainly on unauthorised (non-UN) humanitarian...

Ok, what does the topic say? basically: "Is humanitarian intervention valid?" Go through the article by Rodley and Cah in the 2007 human rights review (Access via library gateway under oxford journals, see link above in the thread) You will find that there are 3 camps: illegal...

thx for that, a new idea, anyway heres more of the responsibility to protect.... i dont know if u already found it: http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/humanint/index.htm#articles...

What judgments did u use? apart from Nicauragua and Belgium v Yugoslavia (which didnt really say anything), there wasnt a heap of cases.....there had been prior examples but nothing solid in terms of ICJ judgments.....unless i have seriously overlooked something... I've contemplated using Sudan...

Hows everyone going?? half way through editing and trying to polish the work up.... hopefully 18+ sources will be ok...... Humanitarian intervention topic is broad..... maybe 4000 words to get the gist of it....hopefully and IWR, if your here, i can lend a hand with some sources if u...

http://blogs.news.com.au/funandgames/index.php/news/comments/the_worlds_hardest_game

At USYD, int law is convened by our txtbk writer Triggs, its a core unit over there. If u want a complete view of law, that is, contextual and textual, do labor law....everything in law seems to be from a Marxist perspective, the law as a result of the class conflict between labor and...

i got bumped up to 24 after a we talked it through

looks like i was wrong, it was shawkat who marked it....anyway and one of the things he wrote was "poor citation" and not enough strategies..... and also he wrote 24/40 and crossed it out and replaced it with 20/40....

My strategies: 1) UN, increase membership to poorer countries-> greater democratic legitmacy -> great balance to enforce against hegemonies->greater legitmacy greater transparency of veto -> greater institutional legitimacy and participation in security council 2) Treaty design -...

Well i guess that indicates subjective marking on things he want to hear..... The essay question was how to promote compliace and enforcement and be pragmatic about the strategies... very open ended question, it would be unfair to subjectively mark on a q like that.

20/40, all that time and effort for 20... anyway thats over, got to find out where i went wrong and try to improve......i certainly get the feeling that Rafiqual marks harsher.....

I disagree, maybe u had better tutors but some of my ones commanded a very poor grasp of communication and teaching skills..... Yeah, there were some great ones such as the third year one or if u have edwin franks but that depends on you choosing the right tute. As for standard, Abelson...

I guess that makes three of us doing human int. heres something on Burma/Myanmur, maybe a good starting point. http://www.cceia.org/resources/picks/0007.html

I havent got mines yet, getting it tomorrow, expecting a disappointed judging from all the comments.... It really cuts into your work and our next reearch assignment after a big disappointed. What topic your doing IWR? i may be able to lend a hand and get you across....

Theres the division of law and theres the department of public law. According to my labor law convenor. Division of law became a black letter law sausage factory and theres only 1 or 2 lecturers in public law who didnt want a black letter law sausage factory...