Search results

Because transnational crime needs to be an organised crime from the two or more nations (One sending to the place where the client is and the client in the other place receives it), because obviously no nation-state is going to allow a missile on its head it has to be a breaching of sovereign...

I chose C on offence against the sovereign

Consolidation of Bolshevik, talked about the NEP, War Communism, the Civil War and the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk

Sorry I don't know

Answer isn't out yet

It was about a non-Aryan girl (not sure if she's Jew she probably is), about how her life slowly changed after the Nazis consolidation of power

I'd reckon it depends how well you talked about the other factors

That's a relief

I am so stupid I accidentally wrote my answer for section 3 on section 2 so I have to scribble out the word section 3 and section 2 on the top of each and hope that they actually accept this

It wasn't as hard as expected tho

You can't tell me issue relating to the independence of a state isn't a sovereignty issue

No jokes but imagine this is done by a young offender.. He doesn't need to take on enough legal responsibilities for the consequences of his action despite bomb threatening is at least a public order offence even if its a hoax.

No bonus points?

wtf

Ye just have to keep on link it to "ethical and moral standards"

Okay

So you did option a?

What did you write for World Order?

damn I'm already starting to forget what they asked for my options Think for Family it was about the legal process for Care and Protection of the Children and for World Order its about a statement about compliance?

Lol I'm hoping my 4 page essays for crimes and Family Law and World Order can give me an 80% in the exam