Search results

Everyone seems fairly overjoyed at theirs. I had a little taste of reality. SAM told me 81.8. I got 82.05. I needed 91.4. Second preference I needed 85. B Arts at UNSW here I come. Do well. Transfer. Hopefully. PS: Congratulations to everyone who got what they needed - 70 or 100. PPS: Is it...

"Sights. Sounds. Differences."

I gave them what they needed in two 128 page exercise books... We'll see how this turns out...

I'vev only just discovered this section of the website and, well, if everybody else is brave enough to post their own stories up, there is no reason I should not be. I am not always my own worst critic, but I cut myself down time and again during this whole process, and all the feedback I...

Re: Who have Chemistry LASt? yeah chem is my last. most hated subject fucking ever. it gets a special ritual burning. teacher is a whore. but it's not as bad as maths.

I spoke about phising for that one. How if you enter it in they can access all your details and use it to buy things online and take money out of your account etc. MySpace Tom wrote a blog on it. Tom's my hero lol. I said something to do with the last question about contacting your ISP so they...

I say easy because if I had spent one extra day studying I would have blitzed it. As it stands it was quite reasonable and I think I did reasonably well.

I don't care about how much I write. If the markers can give me 6 marks in one page, they're going to be happier than if they can give me 6 marks in four pages. I found the exam rather reasonable, although some of the stimuli were a bit dodgy. And the data flow annoyed me... I finished within...

The email question was a nice one. A bank would not let such obvious spelling mistakes as that as it takes away from the image they would try to create as a professional institution. And if it is Bank of Australia, why would the site you visit be www.netbank.com? when that doesn't even...

IPT CAN be easy. Apparently we have to remember case studies? Fuck that. I would rather be ending with with IPT, instead of having to battle it out with chemistry on Friday.

I've never been wrong in estimating my physics marks before, but I'm not estimating this one. I just know that it was relatively easy and would have been VERY easy if I had studied everything.

a few in my class left as soon as they could - didn't bother checking it or anything. just did what they could and got out. i still finished with twenty minutes to spare, but i think they helped me pick up a few extra marks that i wouldnt have got if i just up and left when i could have.

That should get me two marks then. As for a bone scan, I don't remember ever seeing it, but I think it is quite obvious from the pictures about the different capabilities of each one and why you would use one over the other.

45m/s sounds fine to me. It's implicit in the diagram that it's not to the left.

I could have also read hysteria's answer before posting a possibly superfluous comment.

It was 0.3. The lenght will be contracted from the frame of reference of the accelerated particles, therefore it will appear longer than 0.2 metres, or however long it was, to a stationary observer.

I got as far as 80 000 - 10 000 = 70 000 Then put 7MJ I was entirely unsure about this question.

Somethign to do with eddy currents in the copper opposed the magnetic field of the magnet as it gets closer to the block is all I remember writing about...

From all the answers posted it seems I did well on that one. I can't remember my exact answers but everything sounds pretty close. Glad I studied projectile motion for THIS exam :) I didn't for my trials - stupidly.

We only have 60 people in our entire year, most of whom are deadbeats, and there are only two of us that did Extension 1 - and Extension 2, as it were. But I do feel that the I&S, at least, is much more suited to girls. It seems not so feminist based, but there is much more scope for women to...