Search results

Oh for god's sake this is just the bored of studies website, surely you're used to this sort of trolling by now. No of course you're not retarded, and no my views were not meant to be taken seriously.

gosford high

dude if someone makes a bad decision i call them retarded. I'm saying that people who choose to do general maths are either retarded or retarded simply for choosing to do so. Whatever, I DO NOT CARE. General maths remains a shit subject. I did not assert that higher-level maths was...

Well general maths certainly isn't challenging

With a mate...and yeah, make sure if the paparazzi interview you that you do what every other 100 UAI/1st-place kid has ever done: pretend that your achievement came with NO effort or work :P

Hmmk. See you there then (well, amongst the 300 other people + media entourage lol), and congratulations to you too!

Sweet. Oh and congratulations dude.

Hey Wendy - do you think guests can wear normal casual stuff?

Erm you guys realise there IS no first place in course list, right? Namu just knew several people who had topped several subjects. He can't disclose their names to anyone anyway.

No, not quite - also Latin, Greek and Sanskrit. And science olympiads.

Would I say that my favourite musicians and artists are intellectually retarded? For the most part, yes. I never said that being retarded was an impediment to progress in society. Doesn't change the fact that general maths is retarded. And anyone wanting to do something that even vaguely...

Clearly retarded people do general maths because either they are lazy; or worse, they are so retarded that they cannot cope with the concept of negative values in coordinate geometry. It is so that these sorts of retards can earn a false sense of achievement from their bullshit pass mark in...

Hmm look screw it then, sounds like I could be wrong, OR I could be right, BUT I DON'T CARE. Don't bother arguing with my earlier posts. Sorry for sending this thread off-track from the main topic and wasting your time, peeps.

YOUR case goes against everything I've been told, and you have brought NO empirical evidence to this discussion so far, whereas I have ;) I will readily cede to your position once you dig up the evidence though :P

Well from inspection of the stats archive, he's on the distinguished achievers' list for 7 different subjects - including english 2U, so I would guess that his performance in 2U english was actually rather good. Look, I'm willing to change my mind on this issue, it's just that all I heard at...

Oh and in fairness to your case, I did a quick check on the 2008 and 2006 EE2 rankings as well. In 2008, no-one came 2nd. In 2006, the girl who came 2nd in 4U english also came 16th in 2U english.

So if not him - the only person to come 2nd in the state in EE2 a couple of years back - were you referring to anyone in particular then? :P

Well that would be Daniel Swain - and he finished up 13th in Advanced English in 2008, not to mention topping two other subjects, so I'm guessing that his performance in 2007 wasn't that shabby either (though apparently he must have decided to re-take it; still, I don't think he could have had a...

Okay well it looks like we have conflicting sources...does anyone have *definitive* evidence proving one case or the other?

well it's because more than 10 people in 4U english get a true aligned mark of 50/50 each year. So yes, while the english 4U MARKS are totally separate from english 2U and english 3U, the english 4U RANKS must be decided by some other measure, since so many people have 50/50. The measure that...