Search results

everyone has their ups and downs. all you can do is move forward and learn where you went wrong.

because society is perfect? if noone defends or represent the 'scums' then thats called injustice. everyone has a right to be represented. such bigotry suggesting law is for the morally depraved.

yeah i do. there wam is also 75+ , they dont say its piss easy but they say its easy considering they dont have to do much for their 75+. and im going to disagree with you engineering is not the best. law/science is.

you say that as if science/engineering or whatever other courses dont whinge and so on. i could say i have mates doing engineering and they say its piss easy and pointless. theres no objectivity in that or point. get off your high horse and stop regarding youself so highly.

your being so defensive towards other peoples view of engineering because they dont know what it actually is. maybe take a hint from your defensiveness, because you dont actually know what law/humanties is all about.

not every law graduate choose to enter the law profession. scientist dont run the country, because if they did, we will probably all be dead or experimented on. you can thanks ethics and lawyers for that movement. and think about whats really governing society, im pretty sure its the law.

i dont see people who are running the country obtaining a degree in science or maths. maybe you should expand your knowledge a bit outside the fields of science and maths.

what makes maths or science more real or applicable than law?

i read that over 10x , makes less sense everytime.

'Theres no money in law' v 'Law, thats where the money is'. Why is there two distinct perceptions of the income of the Law profession? Which is more correct or less wrong? Are we all just so greedy that the salary isnt appealing to our nature any more? Where do you stand and how much is...

law is hard depending on how you approached it. if you went from science to law, then law would possibly be the hardest thing you've done, vice versa.

those are alternatives. im guessing naj would be like comprehensive law - victim-offender mediation ect. so it incorporates aspects of adr.

i think it meant how does naj as a concept has impacted on dr processes used, like in victoria? shrugs* so if the question was : How has non-adversarial justice impacted on dispute resolution processes in Victoria? would that make more sense?