Search results

yeah no it just told me 98.8 when other calcs say 89... its broken, or at least it is for me

<tbody style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "> 2 Economics 84/100 86/100 85 5 2 English (Advanced) 82/100 82/100 82 5 1 English Extension 1 46/50 45/50 46 E4 2 Legal...

the current is independent, but its not a variable mate... the distance is the only thing that is varied according to what the question gives, the rod was placed at different distances < variable not reliant on the other factors, check and mate sherlock holmes

dude, the repulsive force is dependent on current and distance, its a dependent variable... the independent variable is what you change to affect the experiment, hence distance between

"rod a was placed at different distances from rod b". its distance between

with 14 would there be eddy currents generated? cause i assumed the split meant no induced current so did D :S

observer across the street can see length contraction...

same, i still reckon they should get rid of 19 cause then thats a 18/19 for me :)

there are other methods the police have power to arrest a person if: they believe that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime they witness a person committing a crime they have an arrest warrant for that person

thats not my argument... my argument is the wording of the question "Which of the following is a legal power that police have"... they can do any fuckin thing, it should be asking for what theyre most likely to do

Lou is suspected by the police of having stolen a car. Which of the following is a legal power that police have when they approach Lou? a. arrest him b. fingerprint him c. require him to answer questions d. require him to go to the police station

19. it merely says what do the police have the legal power to do. it doesnt ask what they should or will do. it asks what they can do, and all are legitimate answers. they can require anyone to answer questions without arresting them as i said before, i.e. identification.

if a police officer came up to me and asked for age and address, im required by law to show it and identification to prove it under law enforcement (powers and responsibilities) act. didn't think i'd be referencing legislation again for a long time...

um you can require someone to answer questions before arresting them. They can request name and address as well as proof of identity and all that shit. And for the robbery question, conspiracy is a preliminary crime only put forward if you dont actually do it... Have you ever heard of someone...

I just reckon BOS needs to lift their game and stop giving us this vague trash. Be specific so we can actually show knowledge of content instead of fucked up thought processes.

My very first question is, why is everyone referring to Shane from question 5 as a girl? Shane is a boy's name and there is no use of any pronoun :S. Second I reckon it's after the fact because they explicitly state the fact that Alex and Dale plan. Shane waiting for them can mean anything. I...

its just that throughout the year i was an idiot and didnt put enough work and study in so for a lot of my subjects my marks were average or below par, but once it came to trials i improved all my subjects by minimum 10 percent... so ive been worrying about if with those low marks, if going well...

ahaha thanks for the answer, well i guess i could be fucked then because i know how badly a lot of people will be going from the two classes at my school (my class of 4 especially). Like i was with them at 40-50 percent but i picked up my game at trials. Ah its my last exam, legals before, but...

So I got 77/100 in my physics trial, would i be looking at the same raw mark in the actual exam and therefore an aligned band 6? :)

oh god, topic 4 was my worst. Well that's gonna have wreaked havoc with my monetary policy essay, confidence is dropping a bit now