heres rationale for just robbery
Completing a crime is usually needed before you're charged and possibly convicted. Back out before finishing, and you can't be found guilty. However, did you know certain acts done in preparing for a crime can be crimes themselves? These are called inchoate...
no
if dale robbed the bank THEN drove away he would be charged with both
alex DID NOT rob the bank and hence would not be charged under property
i did white collar (fuck me)
but yeah its defo driving
the trick here
was the "criminal TRIAL process"
the trial starts off with jury empanelment
the committal proceeding initiates the trial process (but is not the first step WITHIN it)
its ridiculous imo
+ regardless of ur reasoning, i pulled that from the textbook
also
alex committed a DRIVING offence (not property)
"If a motor vehicle is used to assist in the commission of an offence, the court sentencing the offender has the power to disqualify the person from holding or obtaining a driver's licence, either for a specified period or until further...
you are only charged with robbery or conspiracy
conspiracy is preliminary crime
if they are stopped short of the acting out the crime, then thats what they would be charged with
if they act it out, they would be charged with robbery only
i did the childs right to safety (and freedom) - Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Childs (sex tourism) amendment act, xyz v. commonwealth etc
again rehashed for the next part on slavery and human trafficking
Crime Short answer: Mainly young offenders (ie. doli incapax, age of...
"The process of a criminal trial starts when an individual is arrested, or charges are filed for a warrant."
so its going to be two answers by the looks of things
b and d