Search results

I'm doing applied finance and economics so technically yes haha

Aww yes I got one

Bachelor of Applied Finance / Bachelor of Economics

I wish that the nuclear chemistry part of Production of Materials was a whole module on its own. I found it the most interesting section by far.

1 - I would discuss that with your teacher, I only did one myself and that is the most common. Although a nice idea might be to write a couple of short stories that all link together somehow. 2 - People will have varying suggestions for this, but here is what I suggest. Throughout Term 4 you...

The whole goddamn chemical monitoring and management topic is a piece of crap

So the underlying rate of inflation is essentially the headline rate without any volatile, one-off price movements e.g bananas after Cyclone Yasi, etc. So if the headline rate of inflation drops whilst the underlying rate of inflation stays the same, it means there was a drastic, volatile drop...

Should be able to get around my trial mark or better considering the essays were easy. So 95+

Depends on marking criteria

You can't reduce revenue if you don't have any revenue initially. Read the question. The diagram is for both, and if it happened to only be for one of them, it would be for $10. Because that's the initial tariff.

We all agree they get 5*20 =$100 in tariff revenue when it is a $5 tariff. All I'm asking is can you tell me how much they were getting when it was $10, if you are so sure.

If anyone can tell me how much revenue the government was getting at a $10 tariff I will concede that it is B lol

If I were PM and said all iron ore imports now have a 10% tax, I wouldn't get any money. That's because we don't import any iron ore (that I know of). In the question, when the price is $30 they don't have any imports. Hence no revenue. But when they lower the tariff they do get some imports...

3 is C, because there is less inequality 18 is D, because increase in oil supply -> lower cost of oil -> lower headline inflation 19 is D, that's standard maths stuff 20 is D, there was no initial revenue I'm not sure about 11. I really don't know the answer

So I think Q20 was a trick question. I think the answer is D because there are no imports, so in fact the revenue rises. Also I don't know what the answer to 11 is. I put b. Altogether a nice paper. I did macroeconomic policy mix and unemployment for the essays.

Went through my paper and looking at 70 without silly mistakes. So probably 68

There wasn't really a general theme this year, which was surprising. Essay was good, talked about patriarchal attitudes. Teachers hate patriarchy. Creative writing didn't really fit my prepared ones, so made it up on the spot. Ensured lots of description. Short answer not really difficult...

For the dotpoint: Gather, process and present information from secondary sources about the work of practising scientists identifying: the variety of chemical occupations, a specific chemical occupation for a more detailed study How many occupations do you think is adequate to remember?

http://media.smh.com.au/news/national-times/poo-thrower-a-senate-chance-4732754.html Yes, we the Australian people are excellent at choosing suitable senators...

Haha that's my 4U maths class. 3 kids