yeah just influences. no strategies whats so ever. i incorporated my two case studies
pretty well but i know i didnt answer the question right. do you think i would get anything for it?
a - to what extent have legal and non-legal measures responded to the evolving nature of world order?
b - explain how australia has responded to world order issues
while people are saying it was easy im here thinking about how hard it
was for me hahaha although i did well on world order, mc and human rights i
screwed up family and crime pretty bad even though i was so prepared for
the family question ! just had a major case of mind blank. fml.
i did child soldiers first and then half way through i
read the question a couple of times and i started to think
that it only was specified at slavery, suffrage etc. but im
glad to know that other people did the contemporary issues too
what are your options?
all i know is that for world order compliance has already been ask in the past three years
i am going to learn compliance for family. it better be on it hahahaha
posted this somewhere else as well but the head supervisor kept
stressing how important it is to turn off our phones. nek minut half way
through the exam his phone rang hahaha
okay this is starting to freak me out a bit, i wouldnt know what to write about
what would you do? would something like INTERPOL be okay to use as an example?