it's not that so many people are using it, just that it can't handle the same level of traffic as the official UAC one as it's just a tutoring company site. That is why it is down whilst the uac one is still available.
Yeah i’d say probably, but marking will be harsher, so a response for a 5 marker which may have gotten you full marks last year will only get you 4/5 if that makes sense. Our short answer questions were a lot easier.
This pretty much can’t happen, they will just continue to revise their marking criteria until they get around a median they like. The break-even will still be like 75
nah bro, i’m sure it’s explained in those videos which were posted, but it’s definitely C because of how sex-linked traits work. for the 4th pedigree, neither parent is showing the trait but it is passed down to 3/4 sons and no daughters. This means it is sex-linked recessive, as the daughters...
86-> 90 last year. This exam was objectively a lot easier except our mcq were harder, look at some of their short answer. I would say it might be 88 which scales to a band 6
it kinda helps if you think about the relationship between the cases. In infectious diseases, an increased amount of cases will result in an even more increased amount of cases, so it’s an exponential relationship. But since this was for a non infectious disease, that relationship wouldn’t make...
Yeah, I think that this is why D is incorrect. Even though genetic drift can result in natural selection, the question says ‘introduction of more b alleles’. Idk if this implies they are introduced from new individuals (which would be gene flow) or if they’re just using that word to talk about...
Not sure how it would work if you didn’t actually name a disease, because then what you are saying could just be generic info about any disease. Should hopefully still get 3 marks though, marking for 5 markers similar in 2023 would’ve gotten you 3 marks i’d say