Search results

I know that this is an old thread, but the answer for question 3 can be solved in a pretty simple way. the diagram below is based off of jetblack2007's diagram. First you construct parallel lines from the top of the man's head, then prove that the angle of elevation from the top of his head is...

I'm doing law atm and a bunch of my friends are doing actuarial/law. they're coping ok, but they don't get a lot of sleep. or time to anything else but study. what uni were you planning on going to?

I've recently had a discussion with some Americans about why the rest of the world views them as ignorant, stupid and cruel. While we we discussing this, a few of them mentioned that Australia is culturally backwards, racist, homophobic and has medieval morals. =/ I was wondering are we...

96.05 without putting efforts into assignments or cramming before exams. Paying attention in class FTW.

Re: Top 200 Schools - Daily Telegraph I'm just glad that 7 Selective Schools outranked SHORE. And that Baulko reclaimed 2nd place.

I finished the 2004 paper in an hour and a half, in comparison to the 2.5 hours it took for the 2006 paper. I personally was surprised at how easy the 2004 and 2007 papers were

Just figured out what school you go to >_> But yeah, that was a lot better than 4u -__- I'm hoping the cut off for E4 is lower this year

Yeah, I know =O How'd you guys go in general?

Nah, it was Andy. However, Jason will probably write a freaking essay about it on his blog later.

Yeah I do =/ Altogether. Some guy in the top class was moaning about how he'd lost 9 marks, because he's pretty accurate and generally doesn't make stupid mistakes. I lost 11 marks on the parts I skipped from 4,5 and 7 >< And then I asked people how they went and they were like "ONLY 11 marks?" Oo

I was wondering this too. I found the test pretty decent, just a bit longer than I expected. I didn't get through the first 4 questions as quickly as I wanted to (I was aiming for 30 mins). Most of the people who did 4u were complaining that they'd lost about 9 marks give or take for stupid...

I felt that way at school. All these people came out, whining about how hard it was Oo I felt worried that I felt confident =O

Probably trolls, because they haven't posted anything. But I'm pretty sure a lot of people found the test was pretty decent.

Question 2 in 2006 was ridiculously long. 2008 was pretty decent =)

I think that was easier than the 2006 paper. I finished the first 4.5 questions in 55 minutes, and had 35 minutes to do question 7. Granted I did skip bits of question 3, 4 and 5 on a whim, which cost me time on the last 2 parts of Q7 -__- but in all, a pretty decent test

Wasn't as bad as the 2006 paper I think. I was a bit stupid in my time management, so i've lost a few marks here and there, in total about 11. as long as i've made no stupid mistakes, i should get about 73/84. I thought the questions were fairly straightforward, but maybe that's because I do 4u...

The questions weren't difficult per se, there just were a lot of them. I work reaaaaallllly slowly, so that's probably why I screwed up =/

Isn't 3u comparatively easier than 4u anyway? I don't think I'll study for it much... I have 3u english the day after, and i need to do well in that Oo

You finish ridiculously quick.

Yeah. It's 2, you're supposed to use the area of the new triangle, not the big triangle. I got 3/2 the first time, so i knew i did something wrong. After figuring it out, I had to laugh at the "not to scale" label ^^