Search results

overall i didn't think it was hard, except a couple of questions ill lose marks in will annoy me, like the kidney, this pedigree validity question, maybe a mark or two in the option...:S

devo i didn't even think to mention all or none principle. i talked about what happens in the process and how its a chain reaction, but only occurs if the stimulus is strong enough to trigger enough sodium to go through to then have the channels open

nice. i labelled medulla, cortex and ureter, and had like a magnified diagram of a nephron. i think i said the medulla was filtration, the cortex was made up of nephrons that did filtration/reabsorption, and the ureter was excretion..im sure its wrong :P

...annika? lol this is stephen :P im annoyed now about that question, and i know i mucked up the kidney

what did everyone put for the question about the validity of that guys claim about if the pedigree was sex linked? I said it was sex linked. Someone said earlier on here that u can't have sex linked carried on y chromosome, but you can...its rare, but there are things? It surely can't have just...

going back awhile, but yeah man I am soooooo with you! Where was the circle geo where u have to trace it into your book? I love tracing. Makes me feel like im in kindergarten again. And what about a 4 mark induction question??? And wth happened to 5 easy marks on exponential growth and decay...

nooooooo.....I got mixed up in question 7b and wrote 5-6am, 10am-5pm! ahh i was forgetting to be safe it had to be above 1.35!!! devo...now i will get 119

yeah man i'm with you. in going back through the paper, i think i got mid to high 60's as well. That was a fairly hard test, and I have done a LOT of past papers. I usually average around low-mid 70's in the past hsc papers, but I know I won't get that in this one. No way will E4 be as low as...

i seriously reckon 120 for me. I can't find anywhere i went wrong, and I had 50 minutes at the end to check through to see if i had made any silly mistakes. checked every single line. excrutiatingly painful

yeah thats true. means also that if u did put in two related texts, its less likely to impact on your marks

yeah true. I personally think its easier without integrating, because it keeps the flow of the essay better IMO. Because then like the marker doesn't need to keep jumping mindsets about what text you're talking about, and you can more easily show a progressional proof of your thesis in each...

Being one of the not so smart people who didn't read the question and wrote 2 related texts, I was reading through the 290+ reply thread about losing marks. I saw many people commenting on how it would lose marks becaues it would disrupt the flow of the essay if they just discounted the 2nd...

Hi all, I have an assessment task for english about conflicting perspectives. we need to find a podcast (it can be a vodcast, but then we can't use any visual techniques) and discuss the conflicting perspectives in it and how they're represented. we also need to discuss the second level of...