There was a whole 13 mark question on the nation health priority areas, the second core 1 one related to it. Something about the New Public Health Approach/Individual Approach question. All about Health promotion and the priority areas.
I thought the test was...ok. Not the greatest. The first core question (men/women health status) was a bit dodgy for me, and as everyone said, the options were tough. It seems that everyone does SM and IP.
One test to go! WOOHOO!
I did those options too, and what the heck did you write for ethical issues? I mean, you could get some, but its not strictly learnt. And for 15 marks outta 20 for that, a bit harsh.
I really don't think it can be 'official' if its not in writing from the BOS directly. I'd like to totally believe you, as I think it will get scaled up. I'd say the state average, judging generally by the people on here, to be around 50-55%.
You can't make that assumption about everyone, I for one did a shit load of study, and looking at people's posted solutions, am looking to get 30%.
It was a hard test, but I don't think 3U would have been required. None of the textbooks/study guides I have have questions of that difficulty in...
The graphing question was ok...10 mins to figure out the dates? erm...
The only question that seemed a bit screwy was that one where it asked you about a plant, and how it was in the swampy environment, and what evolutionary modifications would it need to live terrestrially. 6 marks worth I...