Search results

Which did YOU choose? :p :p

baaaaaaaaaad actually okay, i was just reading through my trial...and laughing at how stupid i sounded...it was quite funny actually...

Investigation, gathering of evidence, police powers of search/seizure... The trial, prosecution/defence, umm evidence, witnesses

Anyone wanna give me a run down for this, for consumers and world order and crime? I was thinking that the morals and values for consumers are that of: Businesses becoming unscrupulous, so they need to be governed (caveat emptor etc.) Is this along the right lines? And what about for...

statute law, common law, constitution, international law ratified into domestic law

Assessing whether there's basis for a case or not 'On the face of it' or something...

:mad: :mad: :mad: I hate legal studies.

I'm thinking not everyone knows about donoghue vs. stevenson, as its only in consumers? So the comparison can't be made...but I don't know...

...Why are u people waking up, at 8am...that is not cool :p :p

Ohhhhh we're thinking of different ones... I'm thinking about the one that was like in march of this year... Thanks anyways though.

Yeah...what was the case called, that u went to?

Was that MTK? And another right?

Dudley and Stevens were jailed, necessity isn't a defence to murder. Necessity = Committing crime to prevent a worse outcome Duress = Committing a crime under pressure/influence

Anyone remember the case between the 4 brothers who gang raped the two girls... The cases were split up into 2, with 2 of them representing themselves, I'm looking for that one? I know the first and last initials...M and K, so I'm nearly there.

I split them...because I think self-defence can be used as a defence for murder. Whereas necissity (sp?) can't be used as a defence for murder [R vs. Dudley and Stevens (no date)]- wahhh I helped u for a change :):)

not really...now i'm totally confused...hahaha but thanks anyway...:):)

Does it work for deminished responsibility then? Isn't there a loop hole then, where you can be under the influence of drugs, and still use deminished responsibility...or...

For this question, both answers B and D, were given as correct That's why people have seen different sets of answers with both B and D correct...me thinks.

...Then if its self-induced, can u go to diminished responsibility? ...I'm not gonna ad to ur signature...hahahaha

Is self-induced intoxication still a partial defence for reducing murder to manslaughter? I thought it was, as it can lead to no mens rea...but townie's notes says no?