• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Assorted (1 Viewer)

HoldingOn

Active Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2016
Messages
318
Location
The Cosmos
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
1. How would I find the domain of 1/1-sin^(2)x?
2. An inequality which has the same solution as |x+2| + |x-3|=5?

Thanks in advance.
 

darkk_blu

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Messages
68
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
For 1 :



From here, you can either visualise the graph of and look at its domain or visualise the graph its x intercepts will be your restrictions and determine your domain like that.
 

fan96

617 pages
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
543
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2024
1.



Therefore, this expression is undefined when .

2. You can either take cases, or use the definition .

(you will end up with )
 

fan96

617 pages
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
543
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2024
How exactly would you apply the definition? Thanks
Actually forget what I said, I misread the question.

The easiest way to solve this would probably be graphing.

You could:

i) graph and , add their graphs and check where it equals 5, or

ii) square both sides (which doesn't introduce new solutions in this case because both sides are positive) and rearrange to get , which should be much simpler to graph.
 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
2. An inequality which has the same solution as |x+2| + |x-3|=5?

Thanks in advance.
If you don't want to graph stuff, you can also do it algebraically in cases.

The cases to consider are x ≤ -2, -2 < x < 3, and x ≥ 3 (because these are the places where the inputs to the absolute value change sign).

E.g. if x ≤ -2, then x + 2 ≤ 0, so |x+2| = -(x+2) = -x-2, and x - 3 ≤ -5 < 0, so |x-3| = -(x-3) = 3-x. Hence the equation to solve becomes -x - 2 + 3 - x = 5, i.e. -2x + 1 = 5. This gives 2x = -4, i.e. x = -2. This satisfies the condition of this case (x ≤ -2). So one solution is x = -2 (you can and should also verify this by plugging x = -2 into the given equation).

Repeat similar analysis for the remaining two cases to finish the problem.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top