I have a research assignment with the essay question, "Assess Hatshepsut's achievements as a New Kingdom pharaoh," and need to analyse two primary and two secondary sources, evaluating their usefulness and reliability.
I'm considering using two texts from these two historians, but is there any great bias or inaccuracy in their judgements of Hatshepsut that I should mention?
I'm considering using two texts from these two historians, but is there any great bias or inaccuracy in their judgements of Hatshepsut that I should mention?