View attachment 31950
For part iii, is it enough to do the following proof?
View attachment 31951
I spent ages trying to look for a way to prove that opposite angles are supplementary (this is usually what questions like this want), but couldn't figure it out.
iii)
Having established ii)
- angle BPD = angle BQD = angle AQE = @ say.
- .: angle PBD = 90 - @
But angle PAC = angle PBD = 90 - @ (
both angles stand on minor arc PC)
In triangle AQE, angle AEQ = 180 - @ -(90 - @) = 90
.: angle BDA = angle BEA = angle AEQ
Both angles stand on same line segment AB and are on the same side of AB
.: ABDE is cyclic
iv) we have already shown angle BEA = 90
Edit
Sorry I did not see your proof; it is OK.
Also: in my proof, I should have pointed out that angle DBQ = angle DBE = angle DAE
and both angles stand on DE and are on the same side of DE.
.: ABDE is cyclic.