We have been told that the crime questions do not necessarily have to relate to the stimulus, but the stimulus is used as a guide and may be used to illustrate the points you make along with LCMD. Say for example you got a question about the influences of chriminal behaviour and only 2 were relevant to the stimulus, you (most likely, depending on the marks alloted to the question) would need to discuss the other 3 as well to get full marks. It is possible (but maybe not probable) that we get a question related to this dot point. In our trial (or was it mid-course) we got a question worded something like this
Discuss the efficiency and effectiveness of various forms of legal measures in achieving justice in relation to a criminal justice issue researched.
It was worth 9 marks and it was amazing how many people had no idea, even though we had been given all these sheets on jurys and a list of other issues we could research. I was the only 1 who got full marks and I don't even think my answer was too crash hot it was only 3/4 of a page long, but the marker said I addressed all aspects of the question.
Well i've kind've gone off the topic neway...
The issue I researched is the relevance of the doctrine of Doli Incapax and the age of criminal responsibility in today's society.
There is heaps of contraversy in this area. There has also been a parliamentary commission into the issue. There are also heaps of dissusion papers on the net and you can refer to the outcome of such cases as the murder of Corey Davis (R v LMW Supreme Court of NSW reports 1999) and the murder of Courtney Morely-Clarke (I don't recomend reading these case notes some of it is very disturbing). It's a good issue neway with a lot to discuss.