sillilouyje
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2025
- Messages
- 3
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2025
What do you think about question 9 with the graphs? I think the scale was a bit ambiguous. Was it D?
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
What do you think about question 9 with the graphs? I think the scale was a bit ambiguous. Was it D?
i put graph x which was option B(option C i think?)![]()
oh nooo you're probably right, if that was what the question was asking. i don't remember the exact wording of the q but i interpreted it as "what is the best product to sell [from the manufacturer's pov]" if that makes sense? was it "what is the best product to sell for the consumer" instead? im so cookedwasn’t it asking about what was the best for the consumer? So a low cost to consumer and high function and aesthetic would be good right?
I wrote about innovation of Uber from taxies and how that make it easier for people to book rides when the driver doesn't know where they are goingm, makes it easier to pay and ride share.Also what did u guys write for the last short answer Q? About how innovation effects the user experience or smth
Yeah that makes sense but we were looking at products that had high function and aesthetics as being good I think. The confusing part to me was the scale on the left. It said rating from 1 low and 5 high. If environmental impact was on 5 does that mean people rated it as being good? Therefore maxxed out on the "goodness scale" like how you would rate a movie 5 stars if it was good? If that was the case then that would make sense of why the cost to consumer was lower, meaning people rated that product as being 'not good to buy' rather than the cost of the product actually being lower than it was to manufacture. Does that make sense?oh nooo you're probably right, if that was what the question was asking. i don't remember the exact wording of the q but i interpreted it as "what is the best product to sell [from the manufacturer's pov]" if that makes sense? was it "what is the best product to sell for the consumer" instead? im so cooked
yeah, i agree with you that the "goodness scale" was from the consumer's perspective (function, aesthetics, env impact), but then if that were the case i'm not sure why they included cost of manufacturing if it didn't have any relevance to the ppl. so i assumed that the scale star ratings meant that 1 = lowest and 5 = highest, which could be applicable to any of them? like we have:Yeah that makes sense but we were looking at products that had high function and aesthetics as being good I think. The confusing part to me was the scale on the left. It said rating from 1 low and 5 high. If environmental impact was on 5 does that mean people rated it as being good? Therefore maxxed out on the "goodness scale" like how you would rate a movie 5 stars if it was good? If that was the case then that would make sense of why the cost to consumer was lower, meaning people rated that product as being 'not good to buy' rather than the cost of the product actually being lower than it was to manufacture. Does that make sense?