hey guys can you help me with these two questions, a paragraph it the idea length.
* Scientists all used the same fossil evidnece when formulating their veiws about H. ergaster and H. erectus yet different scientists hold alternative veiws about their classification and evolutionary relationships. Why do you think these different veiws occur?
* what additional evidnece could help resolve this debate?
anyhelp would be appreciated.
* Scientists all used the same fossil evidnece when formulating their veiws about H. ergaster and H. erectus yet different scientists hold alternative veiws about their classification and evolutionary relationships. Why do you think these different veiws occur?
* what additional evidnece could help resolve this debate?
anyhelp would be appreciated.