• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

G force question (1 Viewer)

cutemouse

Account Closed
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,250
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Hi all,

I have a question - "A rocket is accelerating from between Mars and Jupiter at 26.95ms-2. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut.

I'm really stuck on this, please show me how you got the the answer.

Thanks,

Jason
 

adnan91

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Disney Land
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
jm01 said:
Hi all,

I have a question - "A rocket is accelerating from between Mars and Jupiter at 26.95ms-2. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut.

I'm really stuck on this, please show me how you got the the answer.

Thanks,

Jason
Do u have the answers? my answer is 2.75
 

cutemouse

Account Closed
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,250
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Yep, 2.75 is correct according to the back of the book. Can you please tell me how you got to that?

Thanks,

Jason
 

cutemouse

Account Closed
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,250
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Oh okay. Thank you :)

So as g forces = apparant weight/true weight, is the 'true weight' always the weight experienced on Earth?
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
henry08 said:
I got 3.75.
I've always had an issue with that, do you add 9.8 to compensate?

I don't know, some questions you add an extra one, some you don't (like in this one where he says the textbook claims it is 2.75)
 

Pwnage101

Moderator
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
1,408
Location
in Pursuit of Happiness.
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
tommykins said:
I've always had an issue with that, do you add 9.8 to compensate?

I don't know, some questions you add an extra one, some you don't (like in this one where he says the textbook claims it is 2.75)
i think we do add 9.8, heres my reasoning:

we define 1g to be normal, true weight on surface of eart, ie currently u and i are feeling 1g - ie our acceleration is (0+9.8)/9.8 = 9.8 = 1g

we feel 0g when we are in free fall, correct so we are accelerating downwrads at 9.8 to do this, ie (-9.8 +9.8)/9.8 = 0g

in order to get negative g's WE MUST SUPPLYA CCELERATION SO THAT WE FALL WITH AN ACCELERATION THAT EXCEEDS NORMAL FREE FALL

we feel 2 g's when accelerating away from earth at 9.8 - that is our acceleration = (9.8+9.8)/9.8 = 2g

in all these cases u must add 9.8

its a bit confusing but makes sense in a way, lets change the Q above to someone escaping from earth - it says they are accelerating with that value, so uve got to take into account that by providing no accleration against gravity, we are in free fall

in order to stay where we are in the earths atmosphere, we must counteract it & supply 9.8 acceleration up - then we wont move (the whole the ground exerts a force on me so i stay where i am thing that confused us in year 9)

now in order to accelerate 26.95 m/s^2 as the Q says, i think they mean net acceleration is 26.95, so IN ACTUAL FACT they would have to supply an acceleration of 26.95+9.8 = 36.75 in order to gain a neta cceleration of 26.95,, as 9.8 goes towards counteracting acceleration due to gravity down

so i dont think the book has taken into account that the roket is being pulld down by acceleration due to gravity, so when it says "A rocket is accelerating from between Mars and Jupiter at 26.95ms-2. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut" i think they should say "A rocket is accelerating in space at 26.95ms-2, where the effect of planets' gravity is negligible. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut"

plus, we dont even know the acceleration due to gravity at mars....so i rekon the Q is a bit simple in its idea

ive rambled, but anyone agree/discagree with me???
 
Last edited:

syriangabsta

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
297
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Pwnage101 said:
i think we do add 9.8, heres my reasoning:

we define 1g to be normal, true weight on surface of eart, ie currently u and i are feeling 1g - ie our acceleration is (0+9.8)/9.8 = 9.8 = 1g

we feel 0g when we are in free fall, correct so we are accelerating downwrads at 9.8 to do this, ie (-9.8 +9.8)/9.8 = 0g

in order to get negative g's WE MUST SUPPLYA CCELERATION SO THAT WE FALL WITH AN ACCELERATION THAT EXCEEDS NORMAL FREE FALL

we feel 2 g's when accelerating away from earth at 9.8 - that is our acceleration = (9.8+9.8)/9.8 = 2g

in all these cases u must add 9.8

its a bit confusing but makes sense in a way, lets change the Q above to someone escaping from earth - it says they are accelerating with that value, so uve got to take into account that by providing no accleration against gravity, we are in free fall

in order to stay where we are in the earths atmosphere, we must counteract it & supply 9.8 acceleration up - then we wont move (the whole the ground exerts a force on me so i stay where i am thing that confused us in year 9)

now in order to accelerate 26.95 m/s^2 as the Q says, i think they mean net acceleration is 26.95, so IN ACTUAL FACT they would have to supply an acceleration of 26.95+9.8 = 36.75 in order to gain a neta cceleration of 26.95,, as 9.8 goes towards counteracting acceleration due to gravity down

so i dont think the book has taken into account that the roket is being pulld down by acceleration due to gravity, so when it says "A rocket is accelerating from between Mars and Jupiter at 26.95ms-2. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut" i think they should say "A rocket is accelerating in space at 26.95ms-2, where the effect of planets' gravity is negligible. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut"

plus, we dont even know the acceleration due to gravity at mars....so i rekon the Q is a bit simple in its idea

ive rambled, but anyone agree/discagree with me???
I agree..
its quite stupid how a textbook claims otherwise...what if lets say the markers in our hsc think the same way a textbook does, and put the answer down as 2.75...

then all those who are okay at physics, put 2.75 and get it right...and those who are leet at physics put 3.75 and get it wrong....scary thought @@
 

Continuum

I'm squishy
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
1,102
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I think it should be 2.75.

G-force is a measure of apparent weight over true weight. The apparent weight that the astronaut experiences would be the force due to acceleration of the rocket and acceleration due to gravity. I don't get why people automatically put 9.8 as acceleration due to gravity for this question, since it isn't from Earth but Mars or Jupiter. As the question doesn't specify which one, I reckon it'd be safe to assume it isn't a consideration (I agree that it's a bad question). Thus, all we have is the simple 26.95/9.8, which is 2.75.
 

dolbinau

Active Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,334
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
F=MA

F=(60)(26.95) =1617 N

F=(60)(9.8) = 588 N

(1617/588)= 2.75

Of course this is pointless as you can cancel out the mass and just do 26.95/9.8 but still, I think it's 2.75 because the apparent weight is 2.75 greater than his actual weight (measured on earth as 588N).

Now, if he was accelerating on Earth then you'd need to add 9.8 for weightforce but as it isn't you don't have to IMO.
 
Last edited:

adnan91

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Disney Land
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
geez u talk too much. Ok sometimes u use g+a/g to calculate gforce and sometimes u use apparent weight/ real weight. From the question they give u his MASS so obviously they want u to use app. wgt/real wght.
 

Continuum

I'm squishy
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
1,102
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
adnan91 said:
geez u talk too much. Ok sometimes u use g+a/g to calculate gforce and sometimes u use apparent weight/ real weight. From the question they give u his MASS so obviously they want u to use app. wgt/real wght.
It's better to work it out by actually understanding the question... What you're referring to is the same thing you know, so that reasoning doesn't really work. :mad1:

G-force=apparent weight/real weight=(mg+ma)/mg=(g+a)/g
 

adnan91

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Disney Land
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Continuum said:
It's better to work it out by actually understanding the question... What you're referring to is the same thing you know, so that reasoning doesn't really work. :mad1:

G-force=apparent weight/real weight=(mg+ma)/mg=(g+a)/g
I was trying to help in regards to which formula u use for different questions
 

dolbinau

Active Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,334
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
The book says it was 2.75, and I personally think it is 2.75.
 

ratcher0071

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
617
Location
In Space
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
g-force = Fapparent weight / Ftrue weight


apparent weight: Fapparent weight = ma
Fapparent weight = 60kg x 26.95m/s2
Fapparent weight =1 617 Newtons

true weight (weight on Earth): Ftrue weight=ma
Ftrue weight = 60kg x 9.8m/s2
Ftrue weight= 588 Newtons

g-force = 1 617/588
g-force= 2.75
 

samwell

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
400
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
jm01 said:
Hi all,

I have a question - "A rocket is accelerating from between Mars and Jupiter at 26.95ms-2. Calculate g-force on a 60kg astronaut.

I'm really stuck on this, please show me how you got the the answer.

Thanks,

Jason
i did this question from dt point. since g at a point is give by {g=GM/r^2) and an object is btn mars and jupiters its g is close to zero but g forces are a ratio of apparent weight/ real weight thus g+a/9.8= 26.95+0/9.8
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top