H HeroicPandas Heroic! Joined Mar 8, 2012 Messages 1,547 Gender Male HSC 2013 Mar 9, 2013 #1 Last edited: Mar 9, 2013
asianese Σ Joined Sep 20, 2010 Messages 2,225 Gender Undisclosed HSC 2012 Mar 9, 2013 #2 Hint: uses the triangle inequality.
H HeroicPandas Heroic! Joined Mar 8, 2012 Messages 1,547 Gender Male HSC 2013 Mar 9, 2013 #3 asianese said: Hint: uses the triangle inequality. Click to expand... I have tried but it seems dodgy and can you attempt it and show me? (without lettting using cartesian or polar substitutions (eg. z = x+iy or rcis theta)
asianese said: Hint: uses the triangle inequality. Click to expand... I have tried but it seems dodgy and can you attempt it and show me? (without lettting using cartesian or polar substitutions (eg. z = x+iy or rcis theta)
asianese Σ Joined Sep 20, 2010 Messages 2,225 Gender Undisclosed HSC 2012 Mar 9, 2013 #4 Actually I'm not really sure anymore. The inequality flips on itself if you try to do that. Hmm
Sy123 This too shall pass Joined Nov 6, 2011 Messages 3,730 Gender Male HSC 2013 Mar 9, 2013 #5 HeroicPandas said: Click to expand... Distribute the conjugates, then expand, we are left with: Common factor
HeroicPandas said: Click to expand... Distribute the conjugates, then expand, we are left with: Common factor
RealiseNothing what is that?It is Cowpea Joined Jul 10, 2011 Messages 4,591 Location Sydney Gender Male HSC 2013 Mar 9, 2013 #6 Sy123 said: Distribute the conjugates, then expand, we are left with: Common factor Click to expand... Does that constitute an iff proof though? You'd have to go the other way as well.
Sy123 said: Distribute the conjugates, then expand, we are left with: Common factor Click to expand... Does that constitute an iff proof though? You'd have to go the other way as well.
Sy123 This too shall pass Joined Nov 6, 2011 Messages 3,730 Gender Male HSC 2013 Mar 10, 2013 #7 RealiseNothing said: Does that constitute an iff proof though? You'd have to go the other way as well. Click to expand... Hmm, yes you are right I think. So simply going backwards is sufficient to fulfil the iff condition?
RealiseNothing said: Does that constitute an iff proof though? You'd have to go the other way as well. Click to expand... Hmm, yes you are right I think. So simply going backwards is sufficient to fulfil the iff condition?