I recently did an assessment of frontline which asked to deliver a speech entitled "What price truth?" where 2 related materials are required of the student. I referred to the Insider and the Australian Journalists Associations code of ethics; a 12 point piece of what all Australian journalists MUST adhere to and NEVER do. I received 12 out of 20, and i'm absolutely spewing, the reason is because the english department is saying it isnt a valid related material, can anyone (students or teachers) offer suggestions of what i should say to dispute this as they are extremely adament yet not justifying it.
Im gonna have the big verbal biffo with them tomorrow, if anyone could offer suggestions as to why it should be allowed i'd really appreciate it,
cheers.
Im gonna have the big verbal biffo with them tomorrow, if anyone could offer suggestions as to why it should be allowed i'd really appreciate it,
cheers.