N
ND
Guest
They're not gonna mark me down for this are they?
What makes you say that?Originally posted by t-i-m-m-y
i reckon evaulating in physics is essential... not leaving in terms of constants
You can't exactly give mass defect by leaving things in terms of u now can you...Originally posted by ND
What makes you say that?
You can give it in terms of the original mass, i don't see the problem with that (not that i did in that case).Originally posted by Takuya
You can't exactly give mass defect by leaving things in terms of u now can you...
Same goes for wavelength... you don't leave it asOriginally posted by ND
You can give it in terms of the original mass, i don't see the problem with that (not that i did in that case).
You're always meant to give the final answer in terms of the number of significant figures given in the question. That's why they always give you something with a decimal place in, even if it's 1.0Originally posted by ND
If it asked for a certain number of sig figs or dec places, then i'd do it, but when they just ask for the answer, i don't see the problem.
They nominate 1-3 random questions which they give / take marks for significant figures in Physics and Chemistry papers.Originally posted by helper
Same as what the question is in.
Eg. Data ph=6.0, then answer to two sig figs.
Molarity 2.10 or 11.1, then three sig figs.
Data ph 2, then one sig fig.
They don't normally mark sig figs but will take off marks sometimes and commonly if no numerical data.
Depends on what they are looking for in each question