Legal Studies Notes (1 Viewer)

[jem_097]

Does anyone have any HSC notes they wouldn't mind uploading or emailing me?

- Crime
- Human Rights
- Family
- World Order

Thank you. It is appreciated

 

[monnieb]

If you get any for the first three can you please forward them on to me?

 

[RivalryofTroll]

If you don't mind spending a bit of money, Examine is selling top quality Legal Studies notes.

http://community.boredofstudies.org/1053/hsc-notes-textbooks/316368/selling-legal-studies-notes-95-15-economics-essay-plans-91-%7C-98-1-atar.html

 

[Squar3root]

lol at this thread and your other ones: http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?s=&goto=lastpost&threadid=324031, http://community.boredofstudies.org...24030/business-studies-notes.html#post6653632

in real life; nothing is just given to you, NOTHING!

however; you could look here: http://www.boredofstudies.org/resources.php

here is one slide from my legal studies teacher (who also made "the apps"):

definitely worth the purchase imo. he also made business studies "course packs" for each topic. available on the app store/ Android market

 

[Evertone]

Here's a Legal studies note for you jem.

Irrelevant evidence is called obiter dictum.

 

[Squar3root]

Here's a Legal studies note for you jem.

Irrelevant evidence is called obiter dictum.

obiter dictum is the judges' thoughts and opinions on the case. Irrelevant evidence is called Irrelevant evidence

 

[Squar3root]

Wrong. Obiter dictum means comments made "by the way" or "in passing". Unlike the ratio decidendi, the obiter dictum does not create binding precedent. For example, a judge may make comments about what the decision would have been if the facts were different, or about the conduct of one of the parties.

Your comment reflects a very poor and dangerous understanding of the law.

You read that off Wikipedia did you? Coincidently, I found that exact answer as the first search on Google and how that word was derived. And aren't what you said and what I said the same thing? I remember that from the Cambridge legal studies textbook.

Your privileged education does not mean you are allowed to comment on the education of others.

.......OR was this just a blatant opportunity to advertise?

 

[Squar3root]

1. No, it's not from Wikipedia. I'm a law student at the University of Sydney.
2. You did not find that exact answer on Google search. That is a lie because I wrote it on my phone. You will not find any matching phrases if you Google my comment.
3. I have never owned or had the Cambridge Legal Studies textbook.
4. Under the current law, I am allowed to make comments about others about their education. If you think otherwise, please point to a specific section in an Act that says I'm not.
5. It certainly was not a blatant opportunity to advertise.

My apologies. Not exact; I meant paraphrased.

I think the onus is on you to prove that you are in fact allowed to say those things. I thought a usyd law students would know who the burden of proof lies with....... In any case, my said comment about you: I think you are a pretentious dick door knob

I don't care what you own. I own a scooter........ See not very relevant

Sure it wasn't..........

 

[Futuremedstudent]

There are free notes on this site.

 

[User5555555]

I can help out for all of those subjects. Let me find those notes first though.

 

[senorceepa]

+ 1 with buying notes... If you can get a comprehensive set of notes at a decent price, go for it. Why do all this extra hard work when the work is already done for you by other people?