NFSW signatures - inappropriate or offensive? (1 Viewer)

[seremify007]

NSFW signatures - inappropriate or offensive?

I know the FAQ specifically addresses the following;

Why was my signature removed or changed?
Signatures are not allowed to contain offensive material or links to offensive external websites. They cannot be overly large. They can be changed at the discretion of the moderators. If you have a question/problem with your signature being changed, post in the Contact Moderators Forum.

... but what is deemed offensive material? e.g. a girl in a bikini whilst not technically offensive, makes viewing this site/forum a bit more awkward when in public places, schools, libraries or workplaces.

 

[nevery]

I agree, especially considering the nature of this site can make it popular to view at school. I agree with free speech, but siggies with orgasmic girls in bikinnis and "fuck those nigga cunts" or whatever can get offensive and shows a lack of intelligence or willingess to express ones self appropriately. Free speech needs to have respecful guidlines, and IMHO on this site there seems to be no boundaries, which is disappointing. A while ago I complained to the moderators about some user's signature that was similar to what I described above. The response was that it was approved. So my question is what is not approved? It seems like we'd have to actually get into child pornography before action was taken.I say this in the most respectful manner, however I feel this issue needs to be addressed.

 

[seremify007]

The only safe option is to not browse at work or school I've realised

 

[Optimus Prime]

or just turn sigs off they don't make much difference. Speaking of which, nevery yours is way too big m8, if you're on a laptop it takes up too much space