loads of trials had the projectile motion with the picture so I lowkey doubt it. Hopefully its the 5-6 on lenz law, love that stuffReckon there's gonna be an 6-8 marker on stars, but most likely a 5-6 marker on application of lenz law. Wonder what modules they'll combine this time, maybe projectile motion questions but with the picture/frames per second thingy?
you are evilhoping for a 9 marker on validity of experiments.
perhaps but idk if you can make relativity hard. once you got it, you got it. just remember proper time isnt limited to the one not moving and theres two points of reference. length contraction has the potential to be hard.Reckon there might be a hard relativity question
The twin question was hard imo, but that was the only hard relativity question I came across. Don't know if they can make harderperhaps but idk if you can make relativity hard. once you got it, you got it. just remember proper time isnt limited to the one not moving and theres two points of reference. length contraction has the potential to be hard.
are you able to post the question please? i know what youre talking about its about the twin paradox.The twin question was hard imo, but that was the only hard relativity question I came across. Don't know if they can make harder
didn't last yr have a lot of em qsdo you guys think the physics exam will have more EM questions this year? Hopefully the paper doesn't focus on Kepler's laws
In the PEM trial the first short answer question was a (nearly) impossible projectile motion question. It was 3 marks but took me 2 pages of working lol.i just hope the paper is like no physics trials ive done. i swear there is no such thing as a good physics trial cuz the hsc is much more clear and elegent in the questions.
that group is so incompetent i dont even bother with them. the only decent paper i could find was normanhurst and even then it doesnt really reflect hsc style questionsIn the PEM trial the first short answer question was a (nearly) impossible projectile motion question. It was 3 marks but took me 2 pages of working lol.
legit their papers are so fkin dodgythat group is so incompetent i dont even bother with them. the only decent paper i could find was normanhurst and even then it doesnt really reflect hsc style questions