GAH! i knowhimmy6996 said:How did you go?
essay was weird, wrote a really weird creative
*puts up hand* . . . lol i mentioned it in one line of my whole story- at the beginning.... was going to mention it at the end as well, but ran out of time and i was like racing the clock just to get a semi-respectable ending down. I believe I lost.blueypw said:i just disagreed with the question.. said it's more about challenging the conventional school of thought kinda thing rather than concerning itself around anxiety.. wtf is that.
I sorta agreed with the pleasure aspect, more in the sense that playfulness is the technique used to question the convention under scrutiny, which in turn generates pleasure.
.. so yeah, moral of the story is. u didn't need to agree with it
who else ignored the book as a "prized posession"?
ok my creative sounds quite similar to yours =S i used the ideas presented by lyotard, foucault and derrida and used them to establish different sections of a book, though i think it was quite successful in showing the conventions and undermining realism etcoldskoolsoldier said:Wasn't too bad i didn't do much preparation but i thought my essay was okay. Talked about how "while pleasure is key to maintaining interest in all fiction it is the anxiety tcreated by the callenge to modernist ideals that is the true pleasure of Postmodernism". Used If on a Wineters Night A Traveller, Orlando, Daylight by Aesop Rock and Fight CLub.
Creative writing i had zilch clues i made up some stuff like the book had a bunch of chapters each one destabalising a different aspect of the metanarrative and the last was a story that only finished when the reader (his name was "You") accepted the flaws of modernism or something. It was really badly written though i was coming off a few late nights.
Im also curious to know what other schools did modernism cus it seems kinda uncommon (i go to Holy Cross College in Ryde)
I disagreed with the question too, I went on about how to say any element was crucial or true of all post modern texts was to contradict the denial of a universal truth within post modernism, then went on about how my texts used various elements of pleasure and anxiety but not in all etc etc. I also ignored the book being a "prized possession"... there was actually nothing written in my book and it remained empty the entire time mirroring the nothingness of the characters life. Had fun doing it though!blueypw said:i just disagreed with the question.. said it's more about challenging the conventional school of thought kinda thing rather than concerning itself around anxiety.. wtf is that.
I sorta agreed with the pleasure aspect, more in the sense that playfulness is the technique used to question the convention under scrutiny, which in turn generates pleasure.
.. so yeah, moral of the story is. u didn't need to agree with it
who else ignored the book as a "prized posession"?