Pulp fiction as a 2nd supplementary text (1 Viewer)

[Cold Fussion]

I understand its a very late stage but anyway. What do you guys think of pulp fiction as a 2nd supplementary text for julius caesar? My other supplementary and my first choice is 11'09'01. I ask more in sense that will the markers look at such an essay as a non serious attempt or will they look upon pulp fiction with the same light as say Blade runner? its either i do this or bowling for columbine and i very much do not want to do a micheal moore film.

Thanks for the help.

 

[gurmies]

I understand its a very late stage but anyway. What do you guys think of pulp fiction as a 2nd supplementary text for julius caesar? My other supplementary and my first choice is 11'09'01. I ask more in sense that will the markers look at such an essay as a non serious attempt or will they look upon pulp fiction with the same light as say Blade runner? its either i do this or bowling for columbine and i very much do not want to do a micheal moore film.

Thanks for the help.

Texts like that are somewhat overused and tokenistic. Provided you explore aspects of the film which reflect significant insight, you shouldn't be "subconsciously penalised".