ranks (1 Viewer)

[gossipgirllll]

question!!!!

for internal assessments, how tf do they even calculate cumulative ranks?? like how was i ranked 2nd in both assessment task1 and assessment task2 and now my overall cumulative is 1st ??

 

[alphxreturns]

maybe it was different person rank 1 and u just came out on top

 

[C2H6O]

question!!!!

for internal assessments, how tf do they even calculate cumulative ranks?? like how was i ranked 2nd in both assessment task1 and assessment task2 and now my overall cumulative is 1st ??

I thought it’s just the weighted average of all the assessments that have been completed and the rankings are derived from that

 

[jimmysmith560]

maybe it was different person rank 1 and u just came out on top

This is a possible explanation. Consider the following example involving 3 students: gossipgirllll, Student A and Student B, and 2 equally weighted tasks.

Student	Assessment task 1 performance	Assessment task 2 performance	Cumulative rank
gossipgirllll​	90% (rank 2)​	90% (rank 2)​	1st (based on 90% average)​
Student A​	95% (rank 1)​	75% (rank 5)​	2nd (based on 85% average)​
Student B​	65% (rank 5)​	95% (rank 1)​	3rd (based on 80% average)​

While gossipgirllll placed 2nd in both assessment task 1 and 2, her performance was consistent, as opposed to Student A and Student B, who performed well in assessment task 1 only and assessment task 2 only respectively. She therefore had the highest average performance in her cohort and therefore placed first.

 

[gossipgirllll]

This is a possible explanation. Consider the following example involving 3 students: gossipgirllll, Student A and Student B, and 2 equally weighted tasks.

Student	Assessment task 1 performance	Assessment task 2 performance	Cumulative rank
gossipgirllll​	90% (rank 2)​	90% (rank 2)​	1st (based on 90% average)​
Student A​	95% (rank 1)​	75% (rank 5)​	2nd (based on 85% average)​
Student B​	65% (rank 5)​	95% (rank 1)​	3rd (based on 80% average)​

While gossipgirllll placed 2nd in both assessment task 1 and 2, her performance was consistent, as opposed to Student A and Student B, who performed well in assessment task 1 only and assessment task 2 only respectively. She therefore had the highest average performance in her cohort and therefore placed first.

omg that makes so much sense thanku smm