• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Show vs. Prove (1 Viewer)

karnbmx

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
76
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
If you are required to "show" something, is that the equivalent of "proving" it?

Eg. 1985 HSC Q7. It asks to SHOW that the minimum time taken is 27/4 minutes. Does that mean it is valid to sub in this value into the second derivative to show it is greater than zero, or must one FIND this value first, using the first derivative?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Well, substituting 27/4 minutes into the second derivative, and aquiring a positive answer, does not necessarily mean that it is the minimum amount of time.

Nowadays, the difference between 'show' and 'prove' is very insignificant, but generally we have many 'shows' to eventually 'prove' something.

So for example, you would see:

a) Show .....

b) Show .....

c) Hence, prove that *wider result*.

So (a) and (b) are to establish some fundamental results, which will in turn be used to 'prove' an overall wider result.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top