• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Solving equations involving e? (1 Viewer)

hscishard

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
2,033
Location
study room...maybe
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
This is from Year 12 Cambridge 2unit Chp 2F Q16.

Show that the curves y=e^x and y = (e-1)x + 1 meet at (0,1) and (1,e)
 

bleaver

New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Showing that those equations have identical y values for particular x values (ie subbing into the equations separately) and visa versa is fine and accepted.
The other way would be to equate your two equations...goodluck with that haha :)
So yeah, that would be fine.
 

waryap

Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
122
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
This is from Year 12 Cambridge 2unit Chp 2F Q16.

Show that the curves y=e^x and y = (e-1)x + 1 meet at (0,1) and (1,e)
use the substitution method
y=e^x ---------1
y=(e-1)x + 1 --------2
sub 1 into 2
e^x = ex - x + 1
e^x -ex + x -1 = 0
sub the values in and the equation should always = 0
when x = 0
e^0 -e(0) + o -1 = 0
1 - 1 = 0
when x =1
e - e + 1 - 1 = 0

not sure if I'm correct in doing it this way hahaha... correct me if I'm wrong, please. Although I do think I'm doing this wrongly.
 

bleaver

New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
use the substitution method
y=e^x ---------1
y=(e-1)x + 1 --------2
sub 1 into 2
e^x = ex - x + 1
e^x -ex + x -1 = 0
sub the values in and the equation should always = 0
when x = 0
e^0 -e(0) + o -1 = 0
1 - 1 = 0
when x =1
e - e + 1 - 1 = 0

not sure if I'm correct in doing it this way hahaha... correct me if I'm wrong, please. Although I do think I'm doing this wrongly.
That method is fine, except you'd have to put a statement at the end stating that as LHS=RHS when x=0 and x=1, then the equations meet at these x values.
Your method is basically a different way of doing the same thing.

HOWEVER! - Considering that you've eliminated the 'y' variable from the equations when you equated, you need to go back and substitute back into one of original equations to demonstrate that the y value is 1 when x=0 and e when x=1. Just to be 'technically' correct.
Otherwise there is nothing wrong with your approach.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top