MochiGirl15
New Member
Simple question really, why would one argue in court that a piece of evidence should be considered as a 'view' under s53 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)? Is that because views are subject to more stringent monitoring and other Common Law requirements which do not apply to say, in-court demonstrations?
(Yes I'm referring to Evans v The Queen)
Thanks in advance for any constructive advice!
(Yes I'm referring to Evans v The Queen)
Thanks in advance for any constructive advice!