wheredanton
Retired
.
Last edited:
So you want uni students to carry loaded guns into university classrooms?withoutaface said:If someone else there had a gun they could've taken this fuck down and saved 20 something lives, so I don't see where gun control comes into it given this guy would've been able to find a gun had he really wanted it.
amen.wheredanton said:I doubt it. People are talking about disarming the US population. Never going to happen.
"The previous week"TDjie said:What I cease to understand is how the school, who received two bomb threats the previous week, failed to go into any sort of lockdown or emergency state. It's as if the gunman planned it, if there is any connection, so that students/staff would not have expected the attack.
Agreed, infact its happened in many american schools since columbine. If anything this is support for "shall issue" laws so that any individual that wants to cary a gun around in their bag, their purse or whatever, can do so...even into classrooms or wherever else they are.withoutaface said:If someone else there had a gun they could've taken this fuck down and saved 20 something lives, so I don't see where gun control comes into it given this guy would've been able to find a gun had he really wanted it.
Oh yeah. Real smart.Serius said:Agreed, infact its happened in many american schools since columbine. If anything this is support for "shall issue" laws so that any individual that wants to cary a gun around in their bag, their purse or whatever, can do so...even into classrooms or wherever else they are.
so your saying that you should be able to carry a gun around anywhere, wouldnt this make incidents like this more common??Serius said:Agreed, infact its happened in many american schools since columbine. If anything this is support for "shall issue" laws so that any individual that wants to cary a gun around in their bag, their purse or whatever, can do so...even into classrooms or wherever else they are.
A similar number of people were killed but that's about it.jemsta said:would you say this is the equivalent of the port arthur massacre?
I think he wants to draw an equivelent because Australia introduced strong gun control laws after that incident, and now some people are talking about doing the same thing.Tulipa said:A similar number of people were killed but that's about it.
Why would you want to draw an equivalent? Every situation like this is going to have it's own complexities and differences.
How would everyone owning a gun make a shooting more likely? it would be a massive deterent if every state allowed anyone to carry a gun on them because as soon as some fool tries to pull a klebold, half the class pulls out their own weopons and shoots him down before he can kill a dozen people.so your saying that you should be able to carry a gun around anywhere, wouldnt this make incidents like this more common??
Great.Serius said:I think he wants to draw an equivelent because Australia introduced strong gun control laws after that incident, and now some people are talking about doing the same thing.
How would everyone owning a gun make a shooting more likely? it would be a massive deterent if every state allowed anyone to carry a gun on them because as soon as some fool tries to pull a klebold, half the class pulls out their own weopons and shoots him down before he can kill a dozen people.
good article: http://www.newswithviews.com/Johnston/patrick4.htm
you know very well guns are restricted to mentally capable adults[disproving your scenario two fold] who have had a background check as well as most states making you take a gun safety class.Tulipa said:Great.
So hand a mentally disabled kid a gun, them let him get killed for (in his mind) playing with it when others see it as attacking them.
Smart kiddo.