<METALHEAD>
New Member
I can't believe that test. If i wanted to be tested on history i wouldve done history, not physics. The test had virtually no actual physics in it at all. Apart from that, several of the diagrams and graphs given for different questions were plain wrong (e.g. the coil and magnet q. where coils were meant to be able to swing as a pendulum, yet diagram showed them connected at TWO SEPERATE POINTS, thus not allowing them to swing as a pendulum). Then there was stupid questions like the multiple choice astronaut question. Where it said to state the time on the clock on Earth, AS SEEN BY THE ASTRONAUT. Which was a stupid question, light travelling at c would mean that the astronaut would see the time as having passed less on the clock, whereas what millions would have put it is what the time that had passed was viewed as in the two different frames of reference, in which case MORE time would have passed on the clock on Earth. And these weren't the only things, we had a graph from a datalogger that could not possibly have been true, and other things.
That was possibly the most garbage test i have ever sat, and i cant believe that an physics HSC exam would a) have more history than actual physics, or b) have a number of mistakes in it. Its ridiculous.
Whos with me?
That was possibly the most garbage test i have ever sat, and i cant believe that an physics HSC exam would a) have more history than actual physics, or b) have a number of mistakes in it. Its ridiculous.
Whos with me?
Last edited: