yay!!! (1 Viewer)

[fatmuscle]

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9558594%5E1702,00.html

 

[Loz#1]

No glove, no love.

Or no films.

 

[fatmuscle]

glove or no glove

more films for all

 

[Loz#1]

What a way to endorse STD's.

 

[PrettyNoose]

*rejoices*

 

[cro_angel]

couldnt computers edit it so the condom isnt there... geez pleasing the viewers is more important than keeping the actors umm healthy?

 

[chip]

i love the 'despite a spate of HIV infections among its actors' line

charming just charming

 

[super katie]

wouldnt it be like an op health and safety issue?

 

[eLmo]

making money seems to be far more important than the 'actors' health..
just wondering.. do they knowingly let HIV positive actors participate?- or is it that once they have been found to have HIV they are out of the industry?