MedVision ad

Yet another Space Dot Point (1 Viewer)

nero_46

New Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2003
Messages
22
" Gather and process information to interpret the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment."

This one's got me stumped, any help would be appreciated.
 

Chand

Reflect the lights
Joined
Mar 29, 2003
Messages
871
Location
In the heavens
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
i think they should have gotten the same inteference pattern after they rotated it a certaon no. of degrees, but they got a different one....not sure, could someone else verify that?


edit: i got it the other way around >> look at huy's post
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Huy

Active Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
5,240
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Notes from excel:

* MM experiment

When the entire apparatus was rotated through 90 degrees, a change in the interference pattern was expected (since the two rays were now interchanged). None was observed.

The result of the MM experiment was that no motion of the earth relative to the ether was detectable.

:)
 

haz_it_all

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
137
Purpose of MM experiment was to calculate the velocity of the aether (ether) relative to the earth. Well u know how they set up the apparatus rite? if u dont i'll quikly tell ya.they wanted to see the interferrence patterns wen light was travelling WITH and AGAINST the ether because at that time (pre-einstein) they thought light wuld travel faster wen with the ether wind. light was direcected into the experiment towards the half-silvered mirror which allows sum light to go thru and reflects sum light. these 2 light beams reflect of other mirrors and go to the observor who detects an interference pattern (fig A). The apparatus was then rotated about 90degrees. They expected a different interference pattern...instead they got a null result. MM tried this experiment at different times of year and altitudes all times they got null results. This was later explaind by Einstein and his special theory of relativity which states light travels at same speed irrelevant of the frame of reference of the observor. Hope this clears things up for ya?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top