Islam group urges forest fire jihad (3 Viewers)

[boris]

what are u stalking me or something now you faggot?

Edit: answer my question in the cake thread

 

[daddy-cool]

its always d fukin muslims causin controversy, i mean have u ever herd of other religions causing widespread trouble in australia????
in d past muslim clerks have been critisized in australia for encouraging 'rape', sexual assult, crime against women, blowing up shit....and now they are encouraging starting bushfires....all i gotta say is how can u fuck up d place u call home, coz of deze fukwitz and dere mentality,,

shoot d cuntz involved, coz 3 of ma best mates died in d fires

shoot d clerks, then they'll see if dey get there virgins in heaven or not....:rofl:

 

[moll.]

its always d fukin muslims causin controversy, i mean have u ever herd of other religions causing widespread trouble in australia????
in d past muslim clerks have been critisized in australia for encouraging 'rape', sexual assult, crime against women, blowing up shit....and now they are encouraging starting bushfires....all i gotta say is how can u fuck up d place u call home, coz of deze fukwitz and dere mentality,,

shoot d cuntz involved, coz 3 of ma best mates died in d fires

shoot d clerks, then they'll see if dey get there virgins in heaven or not....:rofl:

For starters, they're called "clerics" not "clerks". They don't sit behind desks in a white shirt and tie and push paper all day.
Secondly, I do so hope you're a troll, because thet spelling and grammar is so horrendous that it's almost laughable. Almost.
Thirdly, if your three friends have a similar amount of intelligence to yourself, then it is little wonder they died in the fires. In all likelyhood, they wandered into the flames, attracted to the pretty patterns, much like a moth to a lamp.
Lastly, Christian missionaries have caused a hell of a lot of trouble in Australia for the Aboroginal inhabitants in their vain and misguided attempts to convert the natives. It was also primarily Christian institutions which were involved in housing and re-educating the Stolen Generations, as well as Anglo-Saxon Protestants who were the main backers of the discriminatory White Australia policy.

 

[Will Shakespear]

Muslims do protest against terrorism. All the time. Everywhere. Just search up "Muslims protesting against terrorism" on google, and you will find a mountain of evidence supporting this. The humourous part is how you find just as many links asking "why don't Muslims protest against terrorism?". It is also humourous how mainstream media runs such stories in such a low profile.

but like... ok, so the BoS muslims are a pretty small sample, and they do to tend to be a pretty crazy bunch

but you never ever see them posting plainly anti-terrorism messages in these sorts of threads... it's always bald faced denial, like

"OMG MUSLIMS AREN"T TERRORISTS STOP WATCHING FOX"

or some cliche like that, again and again and again, as if anyone who doesn't much like islam MUST be brainwashed by "TEH ZIONIST MEDIA" or some shit

 

[Marin3 Muscl3]

Lol i heard this on 2GB. Alan jones was speaking to some anti-terrorist dude. The anti-terrorist dude said it wasnt a terrorist attack. He said terrorists like to be in control and this way they werent in control. He kept talking about these pshycological things. I believe the coppas arrested a man yesterday and charged him with arson along with some other things.

The Islamic group that was posting that kind of shit on the net is pretty sad. Just making people hate Islam. That is, if it actually was an 'Islamic' group. You never know who is behind the screen on the internet lmaoo.

 

[L]

Oh Jesus. Every one of you is insane.

Yes, Muslims attacked the Mumbai hotels. But did you hear about the Mumbai police commissioner who led the counter-attack against the terrorists? His name was Hassan Ghafoor, an Indian Muslim. But you do not hear about that.

Muslims do protest against terrorism. All the time. Everywhere. Just search up "Muslims protesting against terrorism" on google, and you will find a mountain of evidence supporting this. The humourous part is how you find just as many links asking "why don't Muslims protest against terrorism?". It is also humourous how mainstream media runs such stories in such a low profile.

Yes, may Muslims do show their disdain for Wahhabism. Firstly, despite huge efforts by the KSA government, you do not find significant numbers of Wahhabi's outside of KSA. You can see what many Shia clerics say about Wahhabism (calling them infidels and the enemies of Islam). You should also know Wahhabism is not a terrorist ideology, it is the ideology of practicing Islam to the letter of how it was in the Prophet Muhammad's time (e.g. the same traditional Arabic dress). Most Wahhabi's are peaceful, and many Muslim terrorists are not Wahhabi.
FYI, the biggest supporter of Wahhabism is the West. Its staunch support of the KSA (whose government is an alliance between the houses of Saud and Wahhab) is fundamental in strengthening Wahhabism, and the Paris Peace Conference created the KSA in the first place.

Please keep everything in context. Note they said it was a LITTLE KNOWN group that threatened to use bushfires. For God's sake I could walk outside today and say that all Muslims should kill every non-Muslim on the street (of course I'm not saying I would like that, just making a point), but no one is going to listen. The same would apply in this scenario.

Yes, terrorists use the same Koran, however they use it differently. Muslims should be interpreting the Koran literally, and terrorists do as well, however they justify their actions by changing definitions to suit themselves. For example, in a Jihad (which means a holy struggle, primarily a holy war but also a struggle against the sin inside you) you cannot kill civilians, however terrorists say "oh but these civilians work and pay taxes to fund the men that do the fighting, so they become legitamite targets".

Islam means submission.

Apparently this has to be added at the end of a post

lurk moar

 

[justanotherposter]

Oh Jesus. Every one of you is insane.

Yes, Muslims attacked the Mumbai hotels. But did you hear about the Mumbai police commissioner who led the counter-attack against the terrorists? His name was Hassan Ghafoor, an Indian Muslim. But you do not hear about that.

Muslims do protest against terrorism. All the time. Everywhere. Just search up "Muslims protesting against terrorism" on google, and you will find a mountain of evidence supporting this. The humourous part is how you find just as many links asking "why don't Muslims protest against terrorism?". It is also humourous how mainstream media runs such stories in such a low profile.

Yes, may Muslims do show their disdain for Wahhabism. Firstly, despite huge efforts by the KSA government, you do not find significant numbers of Wahhabi's outside of KSA. You can see what many Shia clerics say about Wahhabism (calling them infidels and the enemies of Islam). You should also know Wahhabism is not a terrorist ideology, it is the ideology of practicing Islam to the letter of how it was in the Prophet Muhammad's time (e.g. the same traditional Arabic dress). Most Wahhabi's are peaceful, and many Muslim terrorists are not Wahhabi.
FYI, the biggest supporter of Wahhabism is the West. Its staunch support of the KSA (whose government is an alliance between the houses of Saud and Wahhab) is fundamental in strengthening Wahhabism, and the Paris Peace Conference created the KSA in the first place.

Please keep everything in context. Note they said it was a LITTLE KNOWN group that threatened to use bushfires. For God's sake I could walk outside today and say that all Muslims should kill every non-Muslim on the street (of course I'm not saying I would like that, just making a point), but no one is going to listen. The same would apply in this scenario.

Yes, terrorists use the same Koran, however they use it differently. Muslims should be interpreting the Koran literally, and terrorists do as well, however they justify their actions by changing definitions to suit themselves. For example, in a Jihad (which means a holy struggle, primarily a holy war but also a struggle against the sin inside you) you cannot kill civilians, however terrorists say "oh but these civilians work and pay taxes to fund the men that do the fighting, so they become legitamite targets".

Islam means submission.

Apparently this has to be added at the end of a post

Rep'd. Decent post.

 

[tempco]

LOL bush fires as terrorist attacks? hahahahahhahahah

Well, gotta give credit to the group for using their ingenuity to boost themselves up to celebrity status.

 

[yld]

Oh Jesus. Every one of you is insane.

Yes, Muslims attacked the Mumbai hotels. But did you hear about the Mumbai police commissioner who led the counter-attack against the terrorists? His name was Hassan Ghafoor, an Indian Muslim. But you do not hear about that.

Muslims do protest against terrorism. All the time. Everywhere. Just search up "Muslims protesting against terrorism" on google, and you will find a mountain of evidence supporting this. The humourous part is how you find just as many links asking "why don't Muslims protest against terrorism?". It is also humourous how mainstream media runs such stories in such a low profile.

Yes, may Muslims do show their disdain for Wahhabism. Firstly, despite huge efforts by the KSA government, you do not find significant numbers of Wahhabi's outside of KSA. You can see what many Shia clerics say about Wahhabism (calling them infidels and the enemies of Islam). You should also know Wahhabism is not a terrorist ideology, it is the ideology of practicing Islam to the letter of how it was in the Prophet Muhammad's time (e.g. the same traditional Arabic dress). Most Wahhabi's are peaceful, and many Muslim terrorists are not Wahhabi.
FYI, the biggest supporter of Wahhabism is the West. Its staunch support of the KSA (whose government is an alliance between the houses of Saud and Wahhab) is fundamental in strengthening Wahhabism, and the Paris Peace Conference created the KSA in the first place.

Please keep everything in context. Note they said it was a LITTLE KNOWN group that threatened to use bushfires. For God's sake I could walk outside today and say that all Muslims should kill every non-Muslim on the street (of course I'm not saying I would like that, just making a point), but no one is going to listen. The same would apply in this scenario.

Yes, terrorists use the same Koran, however they use it differently. Muslims should be interpreting the Koran literally, and terrorists do as well, however they justify their actions by changing definitions to suit themselves. For example, in a Jihad (which means a holy struggle, primarily a holy war but also a struggle against the sin inside you) you cannot kill civilians, however terrorists say "oh but these civilians work and pay taxes to fund the men that do the fighting, so they become legitamite targets".

Islam means submission.

Apparently this has to be added at the end of a post

good post =]

 

[yld]

but like... ok, so the BoS muslims are a pretty small sample, and they do to tend to be a pretty crazy bunch

but you never ever see them posting plainly anti-terrorism messages in these sorts of threads... it's always bald faced denial, like

"OMG MUSLIMS AREN"T TERRORISTS STOP WATCHING FOX"

or some cliche like that, again and again and again, as if anyone who doesn't much like islam MUST be brainwashed by "TEH ZIONIST MEDIA" or some shit

you never see muslims posting anti-terrorism messages because they dont care about it because they dont follow that idea. most people who post such anti-terriost posts dont care about the terriosts or terriorism but because they hate islam.

 

[Edu.kid]

Why do people hate Islam?

Because people continue to make shit up.

 

[SAVAK]

tags. lOL

 

[Will Shakespear]

Because people continue to make shit up.

this is some pretty good fabrication here

you'd almost think it really happened or something

 

[SAVAK]

and this

 

[Will Shakespear]

and this

made up by Fox News imo

 

[yld]

your reply
Must watch:
Wakeup Project
Wakeup Project


if your muslim or christian it might be interesting to watch the whole series. =]

 

[SAVAK]

made up by Fox News imo

its nbc

 

[marwanjamiel]

Why do people hate Islam?

Why do people hate Jews?

Why did Hitler hate Jews? He must have had good reason, the sizable chunk of Germany that voted for the Nazi's could not have been wrong. After all, he would not have attempted to exterminate their kind, along with the support of others, unless they are evidently bad people. Their must be truth to the claims that they rule the world and are conspiring against the rest of society, otherwise people would not hate them.

As you can see, the implicit argument that you are making (and do not deny it) is that "people hate Islam, obviously their must be truth to their reasons else Islam would not be so hated. People do not hate Islam for no good reason" is logically flawed, because throughout history people have hated for good reasons and bad. For altruistic and selfish reasons. For reasons of fact and reasons of ignorance. Maybe it is exactly the same reason people hated Jews, Muslims are today's flavour of the month in terms of "justifiable xenophobia".

The intentional picking on of Muslims in the media does not help either, with journalists on standby to sensationalise any Muslim whose tongue steps out of line. We have harsher and less forgiving critique on the Imam in a small mosque than we do on our own Prime Minister for God's sake. Lets see the SMH make an 8 page story on a gaffe made by Kevin Rudd the same way they did on the "uncovered meat" story. Now ask yourself, whose words are more important to report and have a greater effect on our daily lives in Australia, those of Kevin Rudd or Sheikh Halili or whatever his name is.

Why don't BOS Muslims stand up and protest against terrorism? For the same reason that you do not protest against cancer, there is no need to because it is something you would obviously be against. But maybe, if someone opened a thread with the topic "calling all Muslims, do you support terrorism yes or no?" instead of "why are all terrorists Muslim?" or "how scary is it to get on a plane with Muslims?", you would see more replies of the kind "no we do not support terrorism" and less of "not all terrorists are Muslim, most of us are peaceful like the rest of the world, read the Koran properly, etc.".

 

[moll.]

Why do people hate Jews?

Cos they killed a demi-god. And thanks to the stupid bitch who got hungry and ate the apple, as well as the 4,000 year-old book which told everyone her story, people thought that bad deeds could be passed down through children.
Sup logic. Where you been these last few millenia?

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Cos his least favourite planet was Jewpiter.
The guy was fucking bat-shit insane. This is like asking why crazy people eat their own faeces. They just do, ok. It's how they work.

He must have had good reason, the sizable chunk of Germany that voted for the Nazi's could not have been wrong.

Arguments from majorities are fallacious and idiotic.
Up until the 16th century most people thought the world was flat and the sun and moon orbited us. Just cos they were the majority, doesn't mean they were right.

After all, he would not have attempted to exterminate their kind, along with the support of others, unless they are evidently bad people. Their must be truth to the claims that they rule the world and are conspiring against the rest of society, otherwise people would not hate them.

Or he was just insane and the people found the Jews to be a convenient scapegoat in their time of economic turmoil and hence the subsequent conspiracy theories were a result of and not the cause of the hatred. But you know, whichever one suits your fancy.

As you can see, the implicit argument that you are making (and do not deny it) is that "people hate Islam, obviously their must be truth to their reasons else Islam would not be so hated. People do not hate Islam for no good reason" is logically flawed, because throughout history people have hated for good reasons and bad. For altruistic and selfish reasons. For reasons of fact and reasons of ignorance.

Or in the case of the Islams, because they continue to explicitly threaten our society and way of life and carry out cowardly attacks upon innocent civilians in order to achieve their end goal of global Islam and because they are unable to come to terms with the individualism and logic-based morality of the West.
I don't remember any Jews in the past few centuries confessing to such.

Maybe it is exactly the same reason people hated Jews, Muslims are today's flavour of the month in terms of "justifiable xenophobia".

Islams didn't kill a demi-god. Although they have also been lauded by the Church since their appearance as being an enemy of civilisation and a threat to Christendom.

The intentional picking on of Muslims in the media does not help either, with journalists on standby to sensationalise any Muslim whose tongue steps out of line.

I don't think calling rape victims "uncovered meat left out for the cats" is an unintentional slip of the tongue.

We have harsher and less forgiving critique on the Imam in a small mosque than we do on our own Prime Minister for God's sake.

The PM generally tries to make a point of not threatening to burn down forest in divine retrubtion for the population's blasphemy. Although he has hinted at it occassionally.

Lets see the SMH make an 8 page story on a gaffe made by Kevin Rudd the same way they did on the "uncovered meat" story. Now ask yourself, whose words are more important to report and have a greater effect on our daily lives in Australia, those of Kevin Rudd or Sheikh Halili or whatever his name is.

Whichever are more likely to effect our daily lives. K.Rudd generally doesn't say anything of importance, and when he does, it gets full coverage. Like the stimulus plan, for example.

Why don't BOS Muslims stand up and protest against terrorism?

Cos we scared them off with wild and derogitory abuse.

For the same reason that you do not protest against cancer, there is no need to because it is something you would obviously be against.

But you do protest against people who are stopping a cure for cancer.

But maybe, if someone opened a thread with the topic "calling all Muslims, do you support terrorism yes or no?" instead of "why are all terrorists Muslim?" or "how scary is it to get on a plane with Muslims?", you would see more replies of the kind "no we do not support terrorism" and less of "not all terrorists are Muslim, most of us are peaceful like the rest of the world, read the Koran properly, etc.".

This is BoS dude, not fucking Mensa

 

[SAVAK]

I’m not going to go fucking protest against some crazy bat shit mullah. It’s not my fucking problem and I don’t really give a shit.