Lucid Scintilla
Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
- Messages
- 433
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
I understand; it's sort of hard not simply going by numbers and figures, the elitist Group of Eight thingy.The UAI doesn't correlate to quality of the degree program in the slightest.
Yeah, I know. They're different means of spelling out the same thing (one derived from Latin; the other English); an undergraduate degree in law. :/These are literally the exact same degree.
Ha, well... wasn't that a given?No, I'd say many firms are tied up in the notion of 'giving jobs to people with stellar academic transcripts'.
I was referring to the hypothetical when all applicants have equally impressive transcripts?
K.I thought that Frigid and I civilly chased people like both of you away a long time ago. There are always more seventeen year olds ready to jump out of the woodwork though and rank law schools based on UAI cutoffs.
UWS and UoW kids, start your flaming.
... instead, why don't you not chase nublets, and start a sole thread enlightening these 'seventeen-year-olds ready to jump out of the woodwork and rank law schools based on UAI cutoffs'?
Now edify me, how about, bests:
Prestige-wise: U Syd / UoM / ANU (but somehow U Syd, at least in NSW, seems to get a lot more respect).
By quality:
1. Melbourne
2. ANU (particularly environmental law / international law)
2. Sydney
4. UNSW
5. Monash
6. Queensland
7. UWA
8. Adelaide
9. Macquarie
10. Griffith
ekoolish, if you're genuine and serious about studying law, you shouldn't close your horizons solely to Sydney, NSW. A law degree's still a law degree (and it's OMGZ law).
[Quasi-obligatory .]