imsopostmodern
cool as a kuhncumber
not a thing. feeling guilty seeing as sis has been at the gym for 2 hours now.
edit: pffft what do i care? i'm skinny as
edit: pffft what do i care? i'm skinny as
i was so inspired by your post just before.what a pointless post. and to top it off, you're boasting.
Holy shit I am so trying this workout tonight.Less Is More Cardio Workout - Workout Videos - ExerciseTV
I attempted to do this 30 mins cardio workout and then couldn't really breathe 20mins in. So ridiculously unfit.
no you weren't you liari was so inspired by your post just before.
it was relevant in the view that i mentioned how much excercise i had done today.no you weren't you liar
This is not necessarily true. Dominant arm will generally take more of the load in a barbell bench press, for example. Continuing the bench press theme, dumbell bench press avoids this as each arm is required to support and press a given weight, the dominant arm cannot compensate.- Compound exercises force the even development of muscle which avoids imbalances, and imblances cause injury.
Do it! It took me a 5 min break at the 20 minute point to be able to get through it. But I am old. You're strong young and nimble limbs should be fine. Let me know how you go and if you enjoyed it.Holy shit I am so trying this workout tonight.
With exception of omie at a buck .50 who's right arm is bigger than his left, how many novices/intermediates actually have serious issues in muscular imbalances?This is not necessarily true. Dominant arm will generally take more of the load in a barbell bench press, for example. Continuing the bench press theme, dumbell bench press avoids this as each arm is required to support and press a given weight, the dominant arm cannot compensate.
Nowhere in his post did it refer only to beginners. But to answer your questions:With exception of omie at a buck .50 who's right arm is bigger than his left, how many novices/intermediates actually have serious issues in muscular imbalances?
Me, I'd run compoud exercises until you get big, then sort out muscular imbalances once they cause problems (for example I need extra work for my core strength, someone else might not find this but may instead have weak hamstrings).
And in regards to the DB press: its superior to the BB bench press in terms of ROM but requires a greater skill level which prevents noobs from sufficient loading. I wouldn't suggest it.
With the exception of probs jezzmo and you nobody on this forum is over 90kg. Probs misread but I take noobs/intermediates to be the target audience of everything.Nowhere in his post did it refer only to beginners. But to answer your questions:
For me I've almost got a 420kg total with nothing needed but some arm and core work (the former only being for ego reasons). I expect these things to be an issue for me once I'm doing 600+.Most people will have a dominant arm at the least, it's the one you write with. This has immediate impacts on training if only for grip strength. Beginner or not, if one hand hasn't got the grip strength to finish that set of deadlifts, it's an issue. Personally I've also got a dominant lower limb (insert penis joke here), so one leg generally does more of the work in squats etc than the other, grows more than the other, and the cycle continues.
Shoulder weaknesses are blatently obvious though (one side of a press doesnt rise at the rate of another). Its not like you're going to miss it.I would rather deal with these when they became apparent, in the context of a balanced program definitely, but I would deal with the none the less. I don't want to be pressing and have my weak shoulder blow out because it's been lagging behind and I was going to get to it later.
For me personally my total is the pinnacle, if an exercise doesn't contribute to it it's for shit, which is why I focus on the bench press. Considering I'm stronger and can vertical jump higher than a lot of my mates in first division rugby I think this would probably be a better approach for a lot of athletes.As far as dumbbell exercises being 'advanced' I agree and disagree. They require more stabilisation, better CNS response, all that but those are all positives in my mind. Once a person is beyond the absolute beginner stage and is actually training I don't see why they shouldn't be implemented, especially if they have pronounced balance issues (strength or size wise).
My whole point has been that if there is an imbalance that is both evident and negatively impacting on your performance then it should be worked on, within the confines of a balanced program, and not necessarily shelved to a more convenient time.Shoulder weaknesses are blatently obvious though (one side of a press doesnt rise at the rate of another). Its not like you're going to miss it.
I just consider it a waste of time trying to prepare for everything. People add forearm work, arm work, abdominal work, oblique work, neck work, hamstring work, lower back work, rotor cuff work, calf work, trap work, rear and side delt work - if these problems dont exist this 'extra work' just gets in the way.
For me personally my total is the pinnacle, if an exercise doesn't contribute to it it's for shit, which is why I focus on the bench press. Considering I'm stronger and can vertical jump higher than a lot of my mates in first division rugby I think this would probably be a better approach for a lot of athletes.