Does anyone else find this a sad state of affairs when MQ seems to think that
"Almost 1,300 undergraduate students, 7.2% of the undergraduate student population, cast their vote in the elections"
is a good turnout? or is that just the way I'm reading it? Either way I think its a pathetic turnout (then again did anyone actually know anything about the candidates? I felt bad voting when I didnt really know much about them at all...)
"Almost 1,300 undergraduate students, 7.2% of the undergraduate student population, cast their vote in the elections"
is a good turnout? or is that just the way I'm reading it? Either way I think its a pathetic turnout (then again did anyone actually know anything about the candidates? I felt bad voting when I didnt really know much about them at all...)